IF YOU NEVER WANT TO WATCH ANOTHER COVID VIDEO ... THIS SHOULD BE YOUR LAST ONE

 "In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections. Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason. In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects. "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyPjAfNNA-U 

Warning, the above video link leads to the truth about all of these experimental vaccines, and how they can, in the near term, and/or future, complicate your life, by placing you at Hell's doorstep.

 Who is Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D.?

 

  Sucharit Bhakdi -  Thai-German microbiologist

  "Sucharit Bhakdi is a retired Thai-German microbiologist. In 2020 and 2021 Bhakdi became a prominent exponent of false ideas about the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that the pandemic was "fake" and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world's population." Wikipedia

"Born: November 1, 1946 (age 74 years), Washington, D.C.

Fields: Medicine/surgery, bacteriology and atherosclerosis

Books: Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures

Education: University of Giessen (1979), MORE

Awards: Aronson Prize, German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology Prize"

 

Sucharit Bhakdi/Education

 

Sucharit Bhakdi
	November 1, 1946 (age 74)         Washington, D.C., U.S.
	Thai-German
	University of Bonn, University of Giessen, University of Mainz, University of Copenhagen, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics
	Microbiology,[1] fringe ideas about COVID-19[2]
	Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate, Aronson Prize
	Medicine/surgery, bacteriology and atherosclerosis

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucharit_Bhakdi

 

 

Learn more about blood clots by following the link below.

 

https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-report/new-cause-of-covid-19-blood-clots-identified 

 

 

Concentration/Death Camps For The Unvaccinated?

 

 

 "Lefty CNN medical analyst suggests life 'needs to be hard' for those unvaccinated”

"CNN medical analyst suggests life 'needs to be hard' for unvaccinated Americans"

"CNN medical contributor Dr. Leana Wen suggested Saturday that life needs to be "hard" for Americans who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine and individuals who refuse to get shots should perhaps face weekly testings.

"It needs to be hard for people to remain unvaccinated," Wen, the former Planned Parenthood president, said. "Right now, it's kind of the opposite."

"Unvaccinated people, she fretted, can at the moment go about their lives as normal without any consequence."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-medical-analyst-life-hard-unvaccinated 

Leana Sheryle Wen, is an American physician, an op-ed columnist with The Washington Post and a CNN medical analyst. en.wikipedia.org

• Born: January 27, 1983 (age 38), Shanghai

Maybe this is the way things are done in her native country China, lucky for us, at the moment at least, the USA has not regressed that far back, just yet.

What is her next idea?  Internment and Execution of people who exercise their freedom of choice?

Unfortunately, many immigrants insist on bringing their ideologies with them, totally disrespecting local laws and customs.  Who in the world would hire such a nut?  Don't make me say it.

Her kind of thinking resembles that of Communist China, old USSR, and Nazi Germany, for example.  She may be book smart, however, she is lacking complete understanding, and respect of the western world, specifically, the U.S., she lives in.  I sincerely hope and pray that nobody takes her serious to the point of creating Concentration/Death Camps for the unvaccinated.  I hope I am joking.

I know what it was like to live under the NAZI regime, and I can smell, from a distance, the stench of it; what I just learned stinks to high heaven, in my opinion.  Where is the NSA?   Here is a person who, in my opinion, is a national security threat, still expressing her oppressive anti-social suggestions and opinions.

Added July 12, 2021   

“Number of Deaths Reported After COVID Vaccines Jumps by More Than 2,000 in 1 Week, According to VAERS
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 438,441 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 9,048 deaths and 41,015 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 2, 2021.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) included 9,049 reports of deaths, across all age groups, following COVID vaccines — an increase of more than 2,000 compared with the previous week. The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”
https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2021/07/astonishing-spike-in-post-vaccine-deaths-gets-no-media-coverage-as-over-2000-reported-this-week-alone

Link provided by John Day, M. D.

As of June 2021, research shows that out of 169,090,262 vaccinated, 438,441 had serious adverse reactions.  This equates to 2.59, or about 3 people per 1000; not exactly small odds.

In addition, 5 (5.35) in 100,000 died, and approximately 3 (2.43) in 10,000 suffered serious injuries.

People must have the right to decide if they wish to gamble with their health or life.  No Communist China transplant shall have the right to suggest, publicly, hardship for the unvaccinated.  Who gives her the right to do so?  Threatening harm to others is not protected speech.

https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/

Added July 15, 2021

"China mulls banning unvaccinated people from public places"

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/asia-pacific/china-mulls-banning-unvaccinated-people-from-public-places

This is where Leana Sheryle Wen, probably, got her idea from. If she likes the Communist Chinese ideas better than our freedom to chose what is good for our bodies, then I suggest, she ought to return to her China, for good.

 

                                        Hong Kong Airport , China, July 9, 2021

Is it not fun to travel/fly the Chinese way?  Don't laugh, we could be next; our administration loves to order nutty things, just for the hell of it, it seems.

 

 

 

DENYING RESPONSIBILITY FOR ADVERSE VACCINE REACTIONS BY BIG PHARMA AND MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

         Senator Ron Johnson

I highly recommend watching this video, it gives an insight into the lives of the victims involved, and there are many.   Click on link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8

Senator Ron Johnson gives voice to people, whose lives were turned into hell, following vaccinations; it is my understanding that all three of the major vaccines are involved.  Some of the people present at the hearing were volunteers for various vaccine trials, and although they were promised that in the event of complications, their medical expenses would be covered, none of the sufferers received a dime, so far.  It all makes sense now, by denying a link between the horrific health problems of volunteers and the vaccines they received, Big Pharma protects their profit margins.

Senator Johnson also showed some very interesting statistic, in the form of charts, as shown below.

The above graph shows that the highest frequency of deaths is on day two, following vaccination, and from day 10 through day 60 we are looking at daily averages.  From day 10 through day 14 about 85 people die each day, and between day 15 and day 30 about 50 people die because of the vaccines.

The foregoing chart shows that the death tolls from the COVID-19 vaccines almost equals the number of deaths recorded, over the last 30 years, for all other vaccines combined.  Also, deaths on days 0, 1 or 2, approach the 30-year record of all other vaccines injected.

The question begs, who has the moral authority to decide how many people to kill to save a few extras?  Let us consider that the death tolls from the virus itself, is only so exaggerated high because hospitals and doctors, in general, refused to treat the illness as soon as it was identified.  They sent the patients home, waiting to see if they could survive without treatment.  How stupid and cruel is this, so called, treatment plan.

Naturally, when people finally were on Death's door when arriving at hospitals, and doctors refused to use effective off-label drugs like Ivermectin and others, many people died needlessly.  By driving the number of deaths, artificially high thus creating panic among the people, which guaranteed a brisk future vaccine business for big Pharma.

The chart above spans a 25-year period, showing the safety profile for a few prescription drugs, and OTC medication.  Finally, it shows that in just six months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed many more.  Moreover, in just six months the vaccines also managed to produce 384,270 recorded adverse reactions, some of which produced life-changing medical complications.  In many cases, it turned perfectly healthy people into invalids.  Aside from permanent health issues, it will also affect people financially, no doubt.  It is not a far reach to assume that the count of adverse reactions is understated, given the reluctance to accept responsibility by all interested parties.  These folks spend a great deal of effort to pin the cause for these reactions on anything and everything they can think of, no matter how ridiculous.

Authorities are claiming they are following Science, to excuse their flawed self-serving decisions.  This is not Science, this appears to be the deliberate maiming and killing of innocent people.

In my previous  Post, VACCINATION RISK VS BENEFIT IN QUESTION, I wrote,
"The following study shows that real-life data support, with 95% confidence, twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19.  When using drugs like Ivermectin for early treatment, the risk of death by vaccination ratio would be even higher, in my opinion."

https://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/2021/06/vaccination-risk-to-benefit-in-question.html

From everything, I read and understand, we would actually be better off without these vaccines, if we were treating the illness immediately with existing, effective off-label drugs (Ivermectin, etc.), following diagnosis.  We would keep people out of hospitals, where it is almost assured that they will experience lingering complications, and have a good chance to die.

Doctors, especially those working in hospitals and clinics, apply methods that are not very effective, over and over again; this fits perfectly the definition of insanity, does it not?

 

 

VACCINATION RISK VS BENEFIT IN QUESTION

The following study shows that real-life data support, with 95% confidence, twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19.  When using drugs like Ivermectin for early treatment, the risk of death by vaccination ratio would be even higher, in my opinion.

The following quotations are excerpts from the study referred to below.

 "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy"

 by Harald Walach, Rainer J. Klement and Wouter Aukema.

"Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital, 60-572 Poznan, Poland2Department of Psychology, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany3Change Health Science Institute, 10178 Berlin, Germany4Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany;rainer_klement@gmx.de5Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg 1, 7351 BD Hoenderloo, The Netherlands;"

From the Abstract

"Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000(95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. "

NNTV = Number Needed To Vaccinate; ADR = Adverse Drug Reactions; CI = Confidence Interval (95% under the Normal (Gaussian) Curve, or four Standard Deviations about the Mean)

"Thus, we need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination,
we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and,in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case,we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."

"The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and, in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case, we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."  Emphasis added.

https://thefatemperor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Safety-of-COVID-19-Vaccinations%E2%80%94We-Should-Rethink-the-Policy.pdf

Link provided by Dr. John Day.

It should be obvious, for some time, that the entire vaccination campaign is questionable at best; it destroys the lives of too many people (short and long-term, as well as death), with little to show for but sinful profits for a few.

 

 

VACCINATION TURNS INTO MAGNETIC ATTRACTION ...?

 

The following was translated from a "Study on electromagnetism of vaccinated persons in Luxembourg". 

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Above link provided by Dr. John Day.

Translated from the French text. 
Please ignore minor grammatical errors, the result of translation.

Étude sur l’électromagnétisme des personnes vaccinées au Luxembourg

• Florent
• 20 juin 2021
• Manipulations & Gouvernance mondiale, Santé

Summary presentation of the results for the study week from June 1 to June 5, 2021:

Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated people were finally interviewed, whereas the aim was to interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.

The condition of gender distribution has been met. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were interviewed.
    In the group of unvaccinated, of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people with magnet attraction is 0 (zero). So the experience stops there for this group.
    In the group of vaccinated, on the other hand, of the 30 individuals interviewed, 29 have an attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adheres to their skin without difficulty. All of them are vaccinated in vaccinodrome.

NB: The 30th person, who does not have a hook on the magnet, was not vaccinated in vaccinodrome like all the others. She was vaccinated by a nurse with whom she has worked for many years.

Of these 29 individuals, 22 have the magnet that adhere to a single shoulder and only to the area of the injection. These 22 people are the ones who received only one injection.

The other 7 people in this same group have the magnet that adhere on both shoulders.

    In this group, known as vaccinated, domiciled or working in Luxembourg, it appears that:
    17 received at least one injection from pfizer laboratory
    7 received at least one injection from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    3 received at least one injection from the Moderna laboratory
    3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
    6 received all 2 injections from the Pfizer laboratory
    1 received the 2 injections from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    1 received all 2 injections from the Moderna laboratory

 2 of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, had totally abnormal electric field emissions. For the nurse, a video was even made that shows the values emitted by the tester around his left shoulder. For the analyst, the values issued by the tester were approximately the same but the individual abruptly ended his participation under the effect of panic.  Of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 live or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives in Metz but works in Strassen.

It would appear that people who were vaccinated earlier in the government vaccination program are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds much better than in freshly vaccinated people.  More specific measures should be taken in relation to the latter finding.

Note: The exercise is totally destabilizing for the people interviewed, at no time are they asked to apply the magnet to any area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know if the magnet also adheres to the areas of the neck, chest, forehead or legs as well as whether other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhere. This is not feasible in public spaces.

Conclusion:

It appears that vaccinated people do indeed give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier individuals have been vaccinated, the stronger they release a field. This sensation and appreciation, which is only a matter of the tactile experience at the application and the removal of the magnet at the shoulder, should be checked much more accurately, on a larger number of people and with much more accurate devices.

It has been extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play the game of this rather destabilizing experience.

Individuals are interested in the experience out of curiosity and then, when they see that the magnet clings to their skin, they become doubtful at first, then suddenly they become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous not to say that they seem to be completely in shock.

People sincerely wonder how it is possible that a magnet can adhere to their skin as easily as it adheres to a metal pole.

They ask for explanations and the investigator reassures them that there must be a physical or biological explanation. They are referred to the doctor who advised them to be injected for understanding.

One lady even cried when she said that she did not want to be vaccinated but that she was forced to do so by her employer who forced her to do so on the pretext that she works in contact with customers.

In the discussions, it emerges that people do not even vaccinate themselves for medical or health reasons, nor out of conviction or fear of the disease, but more often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.

During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying after the fact that they are being held hostage in a political and psychosocial spiral. Many acknowledge that this injection is not consented to and that at no time have they been given rational explanations (according to the Oviedo Convention), i.e. an insight from the point of view of the balance between benefits and risks and explicit information as to the very composition of the vials used for injections. They then describe, after reflection and discussion, this act as: "error, madness, escape, solution, or even blackmail".

It is exactly these terms that came up very often in testimonies and notes.

Again, a much more thorough psychosocial investigation should be carried out into the real motives that led these vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected. The ideal would be to be able to record and film all the conversations, interviews and spontaneous exchanges with the vaccinated and then analyze them.

The investigation is stopped for reasons of conscience and morality because the investigator can no longer cope with the distress and helplessness of people whose faces petrify when they realize that they have been injected with a substance of which they ultimately know nothing.

The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, is very uncomfortable with these people who wonder about what is happening to them.

People become pale, white, nervous. They put a hand towards the forehead or cross their arms, pinching their lower lips. Some sweat from their hands because we see them wiped on their hips or thighs.

These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or truly palpable and measurable tension.

Among the interviewees, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep unhappiness when they realize after the fact that they have undoubtedly committed the irreparable.

The act of vaccination is, of course, an irreversible act.

In short:
To the question, is it true that people have an effect of electromagnetism after having undergone at least one act of vaccination? The answer is yes. Indeed, individuals become well electromagnetic on minimal injection zone.

To the question, what is injected into individuals and which causes this effect?

We reply that it is up to the governments and authorities guaranteeing public health and the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question because it is they who, upstream, took the heavy decision to "vaccinate" healthy populations with the help of "vaccines" still at the experimental stage and including, during clinical trials , all hamsters are dead.

We will not answer here for the responsibility of each other, but it is certain that if superparamagnetic nanoparticles (magnetic beads) have entered the composition of these so-called vaccines, on an experimental basis or for whatever reason whatsoever, whereas until then these were reserved only for anticancer therapies, then it is urgent to ask for a development , as soon as possible, to the pharmaceutical laboratories and health authorities which have given their authorisation for the placing on the market of these injections.

It is up to the toxicologists and pharmacologists who are now responsible for discovering the origins and causes of these attraction effects observed on vaccinated subjects and it is up to the politicians, who are the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country, to call very quickly for a thorough and public inquiry to be opened into the exact and actual composition of these so-called vaccines.

PS: 2 sites and 1 interesting working document to consult that deal with nano solutions and ferrofluids:

http://www.chemicell.com/

s://www.acrobiosystems.com/

https://bioperoxil.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/pdf/2018_03_30_Conf_Nano_Club_Condorcet.pdf

Are the vaccinated ones really magnetized? Experience and supply of Spike coupled with magnetic beads.

Source: https://lilianeheldkhawam.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/etude-sur-lattraction-magnetisme.docx"

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Although this is, in my opinion, a crude, small ad-hog study it seems, nevertheless, it makes one wonder what the intended, or unintended consequence of this magnetic field, at the injection site, is?

 

 

 

 

WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?

It is my understanding that by design, the Lipid Nano-Particles are to remain at the injection site, where they are supposed to do their job.  These lipids are not meant to wander all over the inside our bodies, posing a clear and present danger to some of our vital organs.  Turns out, this unwanted lipid behavior was known, early last year from a Chinese report, and apparently, talked about by the inner circle, of the controlling interests, who apparently, decided to withhold this knowledge, probably for fear of stepping on the Vaccine brake.

Discussion between (left to right) Dr. Robert Malone, Inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, Dr. Bret Weinstein, PhD Evolutionary Biology, and Steve Kirsch, Serial entrepreneur.

While for most organ tissues, the total lipid concentration ml decreased after some hours, as shown on the graph, as the material diffuses unexpectedly into the body.  The Bone Marrow and the Ovaries saw an increase in concentration, after about 4 hours following injection.  After 48 hours the concentrations for these were still on the rise, this, most likely, cannot be a good thing.  Finally, having unexpected free spike proteins circulating in our bodies, is less than comforting; it is quite dangerous in fact, considering possible future medical problems of all kinds.  So-called COVID-19 'Long Haulers' are perhaps the early warning signal, of things to come.

The discussion panel agreed at the end, one can get always vaccinated but cannot be unvaccinated, should problems arise.

As an aside, from what I know, the person injecting the material should first aspirate following insertion of the needle, to ensure no vein was punctured by accident; not once did I see this common sense procedure followed.  If by chance a blood vessel were punctured the injected material would enter the bloodstream directly; i.e. it becomes a main-liner which probably spells trouble. 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4

 

Based on the findings shown on the above graph, in another discussion the same panel discussed the "Informed consent and reproductive toxicity of vaccines (Robert Malone)".  The consensus was that they would not recommend vaccination, especially of young women.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMxuNvVgxlU

Background:

"mRNA vaccines rely on the delivery of mRNA into the cytoplasm of host cells, where it can be transcribed into antigenic proteins to trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies. However, mRNA is three to four orders of magnitude larger than molecules that readily diffuse into cells; in addition, the dense negative charge of mRNA electrostatically repulses the anionic cell membrane, preventing its uptake. Therefore, mRNA vaccines require a delivery vehicle that not only protects the nucleic acid from degradation but allows the mRNA to get into cells."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41578-021-00281-4  

"mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the vaccine. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus."

https://www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/HealthU/2021/01/11/a-simple-breakdown-of-the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/ 

We already know that fully vaccinated individuals (so called protected people) got infected with the real thing, and became sick, ranging from lightly sick to very ill; some unfortunately even died.  The numbers may be considered very small, in the eyes of faithful risk-takers but for non-gamblers the odds may be too high to experience serious complications, not to speak of actually dying.  Further, we also know that some people who had recovered from Covid-19, and achieved therefore natural immunity, when vaccinated later, ran into real problems because of the vaccine.  Equally, there are those who ended up with serious health issues following their vaccinations; 'Long Haulers' they call them.

At this time, there are no definitive answers to the question, WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?  Producers of these vaccines are playing their cards close to their chest; they deny and/or stonewall any  inquiries regarding observed adverse reactions and consequences, caused by their products.

More and more we hear from people who prefer to resign from their jobs, when their employers demand their vaccinations.  I know of one doctor who put his management on notice that should they make vaccination mandatory, he will resign.  I suppose he understands the dangers of these half-baked vaccines, better than most of us.

Apparently, a leaked internal report from Astra-Zeneca claims that the death rate, per million, of the  other vaccine (Pfizer) was higher than their own.  See the images shown below.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO3g0jCO6v8&t=46s

It is safe to assume that the actual death rates per million are much higher because of apparent deliberate under-reporting.  So much information has been and still is hidden from the public, such as the more serious side effects and the strange, unexpected diffusion of injected material into organ tissues, as discussed above, for example.  Also, the suppression of viable drugs, like Ivermectin and others, speaks volumes; refusing to treat patients early, thus increasing the number of ICU cases, and deaths enforces the Angst (existential fear) among the population, thus ensuring vaccination compliance, ensuring the mega transfer of tax dollars to Big Pharma and friends.  We are told over and over, the vaccinations are free; they are not!

Israel reported a probable link between Pfizer vaccine and 'Myocarditis' (Heart muscle inflammation), following injections.  In fact, 275 cases were recorded between December 2020 and May 2021, out of about five million vaccinations.  This computes to 55 cases per million.  "Severe myocarditis weakens the heart and forms clots which even lead to a stroke or heart attack."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PRScVeHt7k

Note:

You can get your Ivermectin prescription through one of the doctors listed on the FLCCC portal using the link below.  I suggest having this drug on hand, should you become infected.  The cost is about $115 doctor fee plus whatever the pharmacy charges (about $90 for 5 day regimen).  Is is inexpensive, considering you will be, most likely, virus free in about a week.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

 

Last but not least, I highly recommend watching the video testimony before a Texas Senate HHS committee, by Peter McCullough, MD, a more than qualified expert witness.  I have addressed, in my previous posts, the same issues, the lack of early treatment, doctors hiding behind FDA's, NIH's illogical pronouncements against the use of off-label drugs for early treatment, Social Media's blocking anything said, or written in favor of early home treatments with available approved drugs, etc., etc.

While I was touching on most of these issues in one way or another previously, Dr McCullough does it so much better; please learn, from an expert, about our total medical system failure, at all levels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM 

 

 

 

 

 

"Fauci, Facebook: Pandemic show in policy must go on"

 The following article, written By Melih Altınok, was taken from the 'Daily Sabah' - Turkish News. 

"Facebook's changing policies on pandemic censorship and leaked emails make people think about scenarios. It seems like the pandemic theater will continue in the post-Trump America"

"During the pandemic, there has been intense censorship applied to the scientific theses that the World Health Organization (WHO) did not "recognize." Various scientific arguments about the function of isolation measurements or the safety of treatment methods were restricted on the internet.

Social media platforms, which supposedly broke the property relations of conventional media and opened space for freedom of expression, became the implementers of this shameful global censorship.

However, Facebook, one of the members of the modern inquisition we are talking about, recently made a surprising decision and announced that it will no longer censor posts that contain claims that the virus may be lab-made.

While it has become apparent who pulls the strings of it during the pandemic, we do not know why Facebook made this statement, which is in a sense a confession.

Predictions imply that Facebook is preparing for a new global scenario, just like in the coronavirus process.

I don't know if you are one of those who still say "these are conspiracy theories" after what we have witnessed for a year. However, the possibility of starting a propaganda process in which the entire bill will be charged to China does not seem utopian to me.

Or, to put it simply, we can count this move as an indicator of Facebook's effort to adapt to the burning facts that will emerge about the pandemic process.

Fauci’s role

The revelations have already begun. An extremely important example is about Dr. Anthony Fauci. The emails of the doctor, who is one of the most staunch advocates of the isolation process in the U.S. and the world, were leaked to the press.

As we learned from the news, Fauci, whom was referred to by the former U.S. President Donald Trump as "the U.S. nation is lucky that I did not listen to him," was the person who advised Facebook to censor anti-isolation theses.

In his emails, Fauci wrote that isolation measures such as masks did not work, even though he did not appear in front of the cameras without a double mask.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens as U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during an event to commemorate the 50 millionth COVID-19 shot in Washington, U.S., Feb. 25, 2021. (AP Photo)

It is clearly quackery that Fauci, as a physician and scientist, hides from the public what he knows, lies and proposes measures that he knows will not work.

However, this emerging hypocrisy of Fauci, which incumbent U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris marketed to her voters by stating, "I will get vaccinated if Fauici suggests it, and I will not if Trump says it" is not a personal matter.

Fauci's relationship and responsibility with decision-making mechanisms in the U.S. and around the world increase the importance of the scandal that has emerged. The cost of the harsh isolation measures symbolized by Fauci to the world and humanity is incalculable.

So, what would be the possible effects of this development, which clearly show that the pandemic is being used as a political tool?

Would Fauci and his email friends who are covering the facts, such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg, provide self-criticism for the burdens we have been shouldering as the human family for a year?

You are right. Nothing will change if they come up with self-criticism or not.

However, the goal was partially achieved. Under the pretext of the pandemic, they succeeded in adding the electronic ballots, which it is unclear where they came from, to the closed ballot boxes and eliminating Trump.

It was this strategic goal that mattered. Everything after that is just tactics that can be revised."

https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/fauci-facebook-pandemic-show-in-policy-must-go-on

 

PLANT-BASED COATING FOR AVOCADOS HIDES WHAT YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE WHEN YOU HALVE THEM

 Click on images to enlarge.

"Thanks to a food technology startup called Apeel Sciences, eating fresh avocados will soon be a lot easier. The Bill Gates–backed company has developed a coating designed to keep avocados fresh for up to twice as long as traditional fruit, Bloomberg reports, and these long-lasting avocados will soon be available at 100 grocery stores across the Midwestern U.S. Thirty or so of the grocery stores involved in the limited rollout of the Apeel avocado will be Costcos, so feel free to buy in bulk."

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/548464/coating-keeps-avocados-fresh-longer-apeel-bill-gates

It all sounds very good but real-life experience tells another story.  Newly purchased Avocados looked real good in the store, just begging to find a new home, and they did, my home.  I was eagerly awaiting the time when the skin gave slightly way to a gentle push with the finger.  Well, the time was today, and I imagined the flavor of them, while I was cutting one in halves to serve as part of my lunch.  I let the pictures, shown below, describe my experience.

 Notice, the outside rim is still looking nice and green!

Not giving up so easily, I cut another one, and here is what I found.

 Notice, the outside rim is still looking nice and green!

After a little digging it fully revealed itself for what it was.

 Notice, the outside rim is still looking nice and green!

Bill Gates' sponsored company provided a means for grocery stores to trick consumers into buying Avocados that look and feel great on the outside but not so when one wants to eat them.  We have yet another way to cheat the consumer; instead of the grocery store trashing these gone-off Avocados, the let the end-user discard them, at their expense.

Who knows what this coating is made of?  What new health problems will it plant in our bodies?  The fact that the outside rims still look good, tells me that the coating is penetrating the Avocado to a certain level.

The moral of this story is, trust nothing and no-one, especially those businesses, who willingly sell food items that should be in their trash, and not in the trash of the consumer.

I FEEL LIKE A PINBALL

The Internet is no longer what it used to be.  In days gone by one would enter a search phrase, and in short order helpful links would appear, pointing to the page, or pages containing the answer to one's question.  Now, links popping up are nothing but click collectors, i.e. they now hi-jack your question and from thereon play pinball with you; you really almost never get to a helpful page.  The more they bounce you around the more clicks they collect; they get what they want but you almost never get what you want, these days.

 IT IS ALL ABOUT AMASSING CLICKS TO EARN MONEY!

Yes, doing research on the internet used to be fun, now it has become pure frustration.  If this new hi-jack game continues, it will eventually kill the usefulness of this tool, in my opinion.  What is your experience?  Please leave a comment, I would greatly appreciate reading your take on this issue.

Relatve Vaccine Efficacy vs. Absolute Vaccine Efficacy ... Which One Matters In The Real World?

According to Dr. Ron Brown, with the University of Waterloo, Ont. Canada, despite the fact that the FDA says that the Absolute Vaccine Efficacy should also be reported to the public, Big Pharma ignores this suggestion by only publishing the Relative Efficacy of their Vaccines.  After following the simple mathematics below you will understand why Big Pharma prefers not to mention the Absolute Efficacy of their Vaccines.

Dr. Ron Brown explains in a video by 'TrialSite News Podcast' the difference between the Absolute and Relative Efficacy of Vaccines.  Unfortunately, he makes reference to some figures, which are not shown in the video.  While Dr. Brown takes great pain to be clear, a view of the figures he refers to would have been very helpful.

Not to worry, I have taken the time to interpret this portion of his talk, to make it clearer, since many of us are visual creatures.

Definitions:

An infection is an 'Event'

EER = Experimental Event Rate (the group receiving the vaccine).

CER = Control Event Rate (the group receiving the Placebo).

ARR = Absolute Risk Reduction (a real world number)

RRR = Relative Risk Reduction (a number to compare one study to another, or others)

To compare ARR to RRR, shown under definitions above, let us calculate the theoretical example from Dr. Brown's talk.

Here 200 volunteers got split into 2 groups of 100 each; group EER got the vaccine, while group CER got the placebo.

At the end of the trial, the Vaccine Group experienced one Event (1 infection in 100, or 1%), while the Placebo Group experienced two Events (2 infections in 100, or 2%).

First let us calculate the ARR, the Absolute Risk Reduction, as follows.

ARR = CER - EER

   = 2% - 1%

  = 1%        

Therefore, the Absolute Risk Reduction is 1% 

This result is the real world 'Efficacy' of this vaccine; this is the number Doctors, Patients and Government Agencies should work with.

Next we will calculate the RRR, Relative Risk Reduction, as follows.

RRR = EER/CER

  =1%/2%

          =  0.5, or 50%

 Therefore, the Relative Risk Reduction is 50%

By reporting the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) result, without showing also the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) result, they turned a 1% risk reduction into a perceived 50 % reduction, by failing to explain their spin.

As hinted at before above, the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) number is a tool that researchers use to compare studies, and has little meaning in the real world of medicine, where the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) is the number of interest.  While a 1% Absolute Risk Reduction is not a sexy as a 50% Relative Risk Reduction, the 1% represents reality, while the 50% does not.

Conclusion: We, the public, Doctors, and many Officials have no idea what the Absolute Risk Reductions are for these current vaccines, however, we know now for sure, they are not Efficacious in the range of 94% or 95%, whatever it is claimed, far from it.  Our example showed an exaggeration by a factor of 50 times more or less is possible.

The video also shows that according to Dr. Brown, Dr. Fauci exaggerated the danger of Covid-19 by a factor of 10, based not on facts but on a desire to panic the people.  It is not a far reach to think that panic among the population is good for the vaccine business.

Please read the comments to learn about the real Absolute Risk Reduction of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines which ranges between 0.7% and 1.1%, depending on which vaccine you received.

 

 

 

The Evidence Ignored

 Reference:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/about/

https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/official-testimony/

"The FLCCC Alliance – On a Mission to Save Thousands & Slow the Pandemic (A brief self-introduction; Jan 19, 2021)

The FLCCC Alliance was organized in March, 2020 by a group of highly published, world renowned Critical Care physician/scholars – with the academic support of allied physicians from around the world – to research and develop lifesaving protocols for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in all stages of illness. Their MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol – introduced in March, 2020, has saved tens of thousands of patients who were critically ill with COVID-19. Now, the FLCCC’s new I-Mask+ Prophylaxis and Early At-Home Outpatient Treatment Protocol with ivermectin has been released – and is a potential solution to the global pandemic."

"We are dedicated to

• Reviewing all emerging published medical literature on COVID-19 from in-vitro, animal, clinical, and epidemiologic studies.
• Developing effective treatment protocols for COVID-19 that evolve by incorporating newly identified, applicable therapeutic and pathophysiologic insights.
• Educating physicians on safe and effective treatment approaches to all phases of COVID-19, from disease prevention strategies to the use of our combination-based therapy protocols in both early-stage (I-MASK+) and hospitalized patients (MATH+).
• Improving outcomes for people impacted by COVID-19 disorders through preventive and treatment strate­gies designed to optimize health.
• Teaching the public ways to prevent transmission of the virus and to advocate for the best possible care.
• Coordinating and accelerating the formation of research studies that will support effective prevention and therapeutic treatments for all impacted by COVID-19.

We accomplish these goals by sponsoring high quality medical education for both the public and health care providers, via the publication of scientific manuscripts, media interviews, and medical lectures for medical providers and the public."

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19DPijOoVKE

Now let us look at the body of evidence ignored by Health Organizations, including the WHO, NIH, FDA, and others.  I tried to keep the following as large as possible, due to the small font size.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Ivermectin 1 : Politics/Big Pharma 0 ?

I can't believe that to this day dark forces have been able to sentence people, all over the world, to death for the sake of safeguarding insane profits from Vaccines, and drugs in the making, with no guaranty or proof of effectiveness, in the future.  Ivermectin is routinely refused, by Hospitals and Doctors, to treat cases of COVID-19.  In New York, in several cases, Courts had to intervene and order the use of Ivermectin, for patients who were at death's door; each of the patients involved recovered rather quickly thereafter, once this drug was administered, as ordered by a Judge.

Thank God for Doctors and Nurses who are not afraid to save the lives of their patients.  What is still amazing that Nurses and Doctors are also at the mercy of these Villains.  I still recall, where a female doctor was begging for her life, and yet they let her die by using ineffective methods for her treatment.

We are talking here of willful crimes against humanity, and yet nothing has changed, it is business as usual.  Everybody is now afraid to speak out, for fear of losing their positions, their livelihoods.  I have seen this general fear, to speak out, in Nazi Germany, it did not end well in the end, as history has shown.  Despite the medical success of this drug, Politics/Big Pharma are still winning the war by censorship, and fear mongering.

 

Reference: US Constitution

First Amendment

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Ninth Amendment

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Despite the people's rights enshrined in the Constitution, the people are now afraid for fear of retribution by those in power, whoever they might be.  Don't we also have the right to determine what is done to our bodies, along with the right to receive life-saving drugs when available, and we request their use, without the interference of bureaucrats who are bought and paid for by Big Pharma?  The same goes for our right to reject vaccines if we are not comfortable with the idea and thus avoid possible self-harm.  No Government nor any other entity shall have the right to inject us with drugs against our will.

With all these guaranteed rights, why are so many of us so afraid to utter the truth?  What kind of distorted Democracy are we willing to live under?

Sadly, some other major countries with quasi-democracies are not any better.

About real people saved by Ivermectin.

 

 

A British Doctor speaks a universal truth hiding behind a mask.

This Doctor speaks for many healthcare workers around the world, who dare not speak out for fear of retaliation by people in charge, including paid for politicians, who, as she says, have blood on their hands.

 

 

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Alert!

 The FDA announced that six (6) cases of blood clotting have been reported thus far, and out of a sense of caution they recommended a pause in its use.  Apparently, these stroke like reactions appeared days and weeks after injection.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_cmQeEyTMQ&t=74s

"In a statement provided to Fox News, Johnson & Johnson said the "safety and well-being of people who use our products" remains the company's number one priority, and that it was aware of an "extremely rare disorder involving people with blood clots in combination with low platelets in a small number of individuals who have received our COVID-19 vaccine."

The company said that it has been "reviewing these cases with European health authorities," and that it had "made the decision to proactively delay the rollout of our vaccine in Europe." Additionally, the company said it has been working closely with medical experts and health authorities "and we strongly support the open communication of this information to healthcare professionals and the public." "

"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) together with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending a pause in the rollout of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine after several instances of severe blood clots in recipients.

According to the FDA, there have been six reported cases of the rare and severe type of blood clot in over 6.8 million Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine recipients."

"In a statement posted to the agency's website, the FDA said the type of blood clot is called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and that it was seen in combination with low levels of blood platelets. All six cases involved women between the ages of 18 and 48, and symptoms occurred between six and 13 days post-vaccination. "

"The FDA said the pause in rollout would also "ensure that the health care provider community is aware of the potential for these adverse events and can plan due to the unique treatment required with this type of blood clot.""

https://www.foxnews.com/health/fda-recommends-pause-johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine-blood-clot-cases

"J&J's has administered more than 6.8M COVID-19 vaccine doses"

The risk for these blood clotting cases is extremely low.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/fda-halts-jj-covid-19-vaccine-what-we-know

If you or someone you know has been vaccinated with the J & J vaccine recently, please do not ignore the early warning signs of becoming ill, and consult with your doctor, or visit your local health clinic without delay.

COVID-19 HYSTERIA?

Let us look at the excess death rate of Sweden, where no lock-downs  and business closures were in effect, moreover, masks and social distancing were all voluntary, and compare it to the U.S. excess death rate.

You  might ask, what is the excess death rate?  The simple method for calculating is the average death rate (from all causes for all ages) for the last five years prior to COVID-19.  Once we have this average, we can then take the current death rate (from all causes for all ages) during the Covid-19 period and subtract the prior established five-year average, which gives us the Excess Death Rate, due to the Covid-19 infections.

Click on Graph to enlarge

  https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid

For February 2021, the graph shows that Mexico was 95% over the average (the baseline), the US was 20% over, whereas Sweden was actually 2% under the average, i.e. the COVID-19 period was no worse than the usual death rate, prior to Covid-19.  This clearly shows that all the hysteric actions imposed by local and central Governments, with the help of so-called experts, had little effect on the excess US death rate experienced, for example.

Now let us compare the US excess deaths with that of Sweden, more in detail, to show that despite the US's Draconian restrictions, they did not do as well as the country that did not try to destroy itself.  As stated above, their businesses stayed, apparently, open, and so were their schools; no demands were made regarding the circulation of people, everything regarding prevention, was voluntary.

Interactive Graph on website only

Click to enlarge

https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid

How can one argue with the overall success of Sweden?

"Earlier in the pandemic, Sweden did not go through a strict lockdown like many other countries. Younger children continued to go to school, and businesses and restaurants stayed open at limited capacities. There was a spike in coronavirus cases and deaths, adding up to nearly 82,000 confirmed cases and more than 5,700 deaths. This death rate is among the highest in Europe for its population of about 10 million. Recently, daily deaths in Sweden have dropped down close to zero."

https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/510922-the-problem-with-holding-up-sweden-as-an-example

In my opinion, Sweden let the self-limiting forces of nature play out, just like we used to do for all the previous dangerous viruses; it seems to work every-time.  Let us face it, many major countries, the US included, still don't allow drugs like Ivermectin be used to prevent hospitalizations.  Patients receive standard care, whatever this means, however, this care did not save lives that drugs like Ivermectin could have saved.

So far, in the US (and some other countries), when testing positive a person is sent home, with the usual suggested actions for Flu-like symptoms, and told, 'when you really get very sick go to a hospital'.  The correct action should be, the start of treatment with Ivermectin, or a similar effective drug, to prevent the need to visit a hospital, and likely die in the process.  The latter is the protocol in humane countries, where lives matter.  Some countries provide Ivermectin free of charge as a prophylactic, thus preventing infections in the first place.  How smart is that!

Note: The excess death rate method eliminates any bias by the medical system that may in some cases miss-classify the cause of death as COVID-19.

Finally, let me refer you back to one of my earlier posts, in which the numbers showed that in reality Covid-19 is not much worse than some of the other viruses of the past.  Hysteria did not go into overdrive, in these instances.

https://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/2020/09/why-would-anyone-analyse-questionable.html

 

Added April 10, 2021

"Dr. Ron Brown of Waterloo University talks about his Cambridge and Medicina Paper. We discuss relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkwn5I8tLmE 

The point Doctor Brown is making is that authorities, including Dr. Fauci, published both inflated and understated numbers, to suit their objectives, to ensure that the public will reach the panic level quickly, and thus become obedient subjects.

I strongly suggest watching this video, as Dr. Brown's presentation validates what others and I have been writing about, for some time now.