WILL SANITY EVER RETURN?

In my opinion, macro-planers (read, Think Tanks) of the world needed a process, by which they could harvest mass private information from their unsuspecting suspects, without being accused of using Nazi and/or Stasi methods, to spy on its population. The early Cell phones were, basically, just phones, and as such, these were very dumb, i.e., not suitable for spying and data collection. However, these early phones served to condition the people, for what was to come, ‘Smart Phones’, People pay good money for these smart cell phones, which help ‘Big Brother’ to learn more and more private information, from those ready to post their data. While people, all over the world, are preoccupied with their social media accounts, posting private information, including data about their families, pictures of every description, etc. It was not totally unexpected that Governments were more than tempted to mass store this drove of information, all part of their vision. The beauty of this is, as far as Big Brother is concerned, there is no need to hire data entry clerks, who could squeal, and inform the public about it.

These phones are not inexpensive, and to ensure that their citizens could afford them, since most people are living from paycheck to paycheck, money had to be allocated from other discretionary spending. In days gone by, people used to dress up when going to movies, church, concerts or theaters, these clothes amounted to significant outlay. Hence, these monies could be made available, if the fashion were long lasting Jeans, better yet jeans badly worn with holes and tears, to make this fashionable (acceptable) even longer. The elite, film stars, star singers, etc. started to lead this so-called fashion trend, and guess what, the people had now extra money for ‘Smartphones’, each generation of which, better equipped for data collection. Oh, we were told, these improvements were for our greater enjoyment, however, these new generation phones were designed to better intrude into our once private space, make no mistake about it.

Apparently, communist China insists that everybody has one of these smart phones, and the idea behind it is clear. In more affluent countries, people stand in line to buy the next generation gadget, no matter the price. This allows some Governments to maintain the mirage of free choice.

Will Sanity ever return?

Despite the fact that the COVID Pandemic, once called the pandemic of the unvaccinated, has now become the pandemic of the vaccinated, because significantly more of the vaccinated get now infected, and need hospitalization, while many suffer from the serious side effects of these vaccines. Moreover, we now know, the vaccinated can and will infect others. Knowing all this, the powers that be, are still pushing hard to convince more people to take the ‘jab’. When traveling one might still be forced to take the ‘Jab”, to enter foreign countries.

Washington Post reports, “Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Here’s why.” “For the first time, a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.

Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted, according to an analysis conducted for The Health 202 by Cynthia Cox, vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/vaccinated-people-now-make-up-majority-covid-deaths/

KFF reports: “Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now?”

“The share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen. In fall 2021, about 3 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted. But by January 2022, as we showed in an analysis posted on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, about 4 in 10 deaths were vaccinated or boosted. By April 2022, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data show that about 6 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted, and that’s remained true through at least August 2022 (the most recent month of data).” The link shown, shows interesting charts on this topic. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/why-do-vaccinated-people-represent-most-covid-19-deaths-right-now/

The National Library of Medicine contains the following article.

Abstract: “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”

“The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health. “ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/

Government agencies, including the President, promised, publicly, that these vaccines will protect us from infection, make sure that we cannot infect others, and we will not die, etc., etc. Turns out, none of these promises could be kept because these vaccines were only effective, when it came to destroying our innate immunity.

Will Sanity ever return?

There are many more social issues, affecting all of us, and, in time, some of these will be discussed in future writings.

Twitter Dump Five ... What Do You Think About These Revelations?

 Guess what?  More truth has bubbled to the surface.  These revelations were evidently not fabricated by anyone but came from the records of the camp that spent a lot of time and energy hiding the truth, by censorship, from the public.

Seriously, it is my opinion, there is no politics involved with these dumps, the only goal is to ensure that current Twitter members can now assume that free speech is again alive and well, on the Twitter platform.  In other words, The first Amendment of the Constitution is now again respected.

You can leave your comments also on this Blog, which has never censored anybody.  While this blog is not a political blog but a Social one, hints of political leaning comments have survived on this blog.  I too respect the First Amendment of the Constitution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALEkfJV18uQ 

 

 

THERE IS LITTLE TO ADD TO THE ARTICLE BY Jeff Landry | Fox News

 OPINION BY:  Jeff Landry | Fox News

"I deposed Dr. Fauci for seven hours. Here's what I learned about 'science'"

"Censorship of voices in the name of pseudoscience should never happen again"

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg? One potential answer is that the chicken was first, and the egg was in it. So it is with our current dilemma: which came first, the corruption of science or the censoring of speech? 

It appears they’ve walked hand-in-hand for quite some time, becoming all the more apparent with the consolidation of social media power and the collective efforts of federal bureaucrats who wish to control not only what you think but especially what you say. During no time in human history was this more obvious than during the COVID-19 crisis where social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative.

Throughout the pandemic, doctors, scientists, patients, and families were censored, shadow-banned, blocked, and punished for having views, opinions, and research findings disfavored by the government and their chosen gatekeepers. Hard fast truths that have become indisputable over time, ranging from the effectiveness of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to the potential dangers of Remdesivir and the failures of the vaccine were labeled as "disinformation" and "misinformation."

This was done in direct collusion with social media companies, allowing the federal government and its senior officials to effectively silence legitimate debate in the modern public square. And just as George Washington warned in 1783, "dumb and silent" many of us were "led, like sheep, to the slaughter." Still the government’s message remained clear: trust the science and believe Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

However, science is not belief; a scientist is not supposed to believe anything. It is the role of the scientist to question, debate, refute, and demonstrate with evidence - not blindly accept ideas based on a set of beliefs. Yet over time, classical, evidence-based science has been usurped by hyper-monetized and hyper-propagandized institutions still hiding behind the mask of what it used to be.  

For example, Fauci, who believes he represents science itself, has a long history of silencing dissent, neutralizing debate, and destroying the career of any scientist who disagrees with him by ensuring their research is never funded, published, or taken seriously. Many a scientist over the past fifty years has been vilified, ridiculed, and sacrificed at this altar of Fauci-ism and the profits that come with it. As a result, he has never been forced to debate or prove anything over his 54 years with the NIH. Yet he argues in the documentary FAUCI, "I’m the bad guy to an entire subset of people because I represent something that is uncomfortable to them. It's called the truth."  

In that same film, Susan Rice waxed poetic about Fauci’s "fact-based, evidence-based leadership" while Bill Gates called him "a rockstar" for the truth. Indeed, the man who has graced everything from prayer candles to the covers of InStyle and People magazine has been touted as a symbol of consistency, integrity, and truth. And in collusion with social media, he became the curator of supposedly scientifically-based, evidence-based speech. Anything that did not meet that uniquely Fauci standard, whether on Facebook, Twitter, or even Pinterest, had to be destroyed faster than SARS-CoV-2 itself.

So, over our seven-hour deposition, what did Fauci have to say about the "science" he supposedly represents? What evidence did he have to support his unquestionable beliefs, from aggressive mask mandates to lockdowns? Why did he attempt to hide his work with Dr. Peter Daszak on gain-of-function research and attempt to kill the highly likely lab-leak theory? 

And if the mRNA vaccines his NIH actively developed over the past decade are so effective, why did the multi-jabbed Fauci glare at the court reporter who happened to sneeze, then have her wear a mask because he "didn’t want to catch COVID?" Instead of providing us with answers, this supposed beacon of truth said "I don’t recall" 174 times, all while evading questions, trying to run out the clock, and insisting he’s a very busy man (with his signature condescension).

But the fact is, Fauci was never too busy to have Mark Zuckerberg and others actively censor those who did know, who were right, and who might have saved lives during this recent pandemic. Of course, Fauci insists another one is right around the corner; but thanks to this lawsuit, such censorship of voices in the name of pseudoscience should never happen again.

That is our goal moving forward - to ensure that your First Amendment rights are not only protected but also enforced. Hopefully then real science can return to its rightful place in our society as an evidence-based pursuit of Truth, because anything less is simply Newspeak."

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/deposed-anthony-fauci-seven-hours-heres-learned-about-science 

 "Jeff Landry is attorney general of Louisiana and immediate past Chairman of the Republican Attorneys General Association."

Note: Personally, I do not care from where the truth comes from.

 

 

More Truth Percolating To The Surface, As It Always Does In Time

 Thank you Dr. John Day - M.D. for bringing this report to my attention.  The following is reflected in Dr. Day's Blog.  [http://drjohnsblog@substack.com]

"Vaccine Deaths Outnumber Covid Deaths in U.S. Households, Two New Polls Confirm https://dailysceptic.org/2022/08/06/vaccine-deaths-outnumber-covid-deaths-in-u-s-households-two-new-polls-confirm/​

Adverse vaccine events reported to Pfizer in Australia up through April 15, 2022, Freedom of Information request​;Total cases reported 1,348,078.
75% of cases reported are under the age of 65.
Over 68% of cases are female.
387,675 (29%) of cases are described as “serious”.
17,156 reported cases for pregnant or breastfeeding women.  45,523 paediatric cases.
4,563,768 adverse events (average 3.4 per case).
646,837 nervous system disorders.
503,108 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.
299,486 gastrointestinal disorders.
209,213 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders.
176,907 respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders.
162,086 reproductive system and breast disorders.
114,375 cardiac disorders.
93,097 blood and lymphatic system disorders.

https://metatron.substack.com/p/cumulative-number-of-case-reports?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email "

 

 

FOREWARNED IS FOREARMED

 When asked, why is there no widespread outcry by the public, about the many vaccine injuries and deaths reported, Dr. Peter McCullough figures, since so many of us have been vaccinated, the vast majority is the victim of 'Willful Denial'.  I guess, it is human nature, in general, not to believe the worse, which may be a protective psychological mechanism, in my opinion.

These doctors and many like them, started out, a few years ago, to care for COVID-19 infected patients, are now majorly dealing with vaccine induced illnesses, and there are apparently many.

I am posting the following link, strictly as a public service; it is up to the individual to decide whether or not 'Forewarned is Forearmed'.

https://rumble.com/v1ejdup-crony-capitalism-big-pharma-and-vaccines-ft.-sen.-johnson-dr.-kory-dr.-malo.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=4&fbclid=IwAR3D1wooykOP2mlK3Uq3N0NOOSkLnaKxQVXkLqnETAkdqYlR6AtE0njjLfI&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ba87bc1a-de01-4dd4-ab90-d14c8e5cf8ed 

 

Added 1/20/2023 - Thank you Dr. John Day M.D. for bringing this to my attention. 

https://expose-news.com/2023/01/17/fauci-lied-hundreds-thousands-children-died/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

"Time and time again throughout 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci, stood at the podium, the bright lights of the cameras blinding him as he faced the nation. With a steady hand, he held up a vial of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, promising it would be the key to protecting America and its children from the “deadly” Covid-19 disease supposedly ravaging the country.

But little did the public know, the truth about the Covid vaccine’s safety had been buried deep within Fauci’s own lies and deceit and confidential U.S. Government and Pfizer documents.

Fauci used propaganda, lies and manipulation to coerce parents into getting their children vaccinated."

 

 

 

 

CDC'S Understated Adverse Events ... Yet Is Still Shocking

 We must keep in mind that "adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, include 26,059 deaths and 211,584 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 18, 2022", for a total of 237,643 over 460 days.   That is about 517 adverse events per day, or about 57 deaths per day, enough to pull these vaccines from market.  No other vaccine, in history, survived such bad numbers, and yet people are still forced today, in some cases, to play this Russian Roulette game.

"VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,195,396 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 26,059 deaths and 211,584 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 18, 2022."

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/myocarditis-kids-after-covid-vaccine-vaers-data/?

Link provided by Dr. John Day M.D

It is well-known that the VAERS data is highly suspect, since many independent sources have estimated that the actual numbers are very much higher by factors up to tenfold.

The same is true for other CORONA  statistics, as shown below.

"Official Counts Understate the U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll"

"Inconsistent protocols, limited resources and a patchwork of decision making have led to an undercounting of people with the coronavirus who have died, health experts say."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/us/coronavirus-deaths-undercount.html 

 

While the masses were suffering with illnesses, deaths, job losses, business losses and life restrictions, etc., some amassed ungodly profits, with one example shown below.

 For some Bio-Tech companies life was great in 2021, one such company BioNTech (a German based company), saw their profits jump from 15.2 Million Euros to 10.3 Billion Euros in 2021.

https://www.dailysabah.com/business/tech/biontech-profits-jump-to-115b-in-2021-up-from-17m-in-2020

 With these kinds of profits, it is no wonder why companies like that, and their friends, don't want to see the end of it.  These kinds of profits are nothing short of highway robbery, the extraction of worldwide tax dollars from the common people involved.  While Governments refuse to provide their taxpayers and families, the necessary services because of lack of funds, they have plenty of money to waste on poor quality and dangerous vaccines, while ignoring inexpensive off-label drugs, superior to their half-baked products.

 

 

 

IS THIS THE DEATHBED CONFESSION BY THE NEW YORK TIMES?

Honestly, I did not make this up!  The idea that a major news outlet, such as the New York Times (NYT) would publish the following editorial, is beyond belief.  Many of us are aware that this problem, at issue, exists through reported stories, or from personal experience.  Yes, the right to free of speech has been violated by many, so called Social platforms, as well as by many democratic Governments of the world, at all levels, the U.S. included.  The NYT learned, apparently, from the opinions expressed by people that all is not well in the US.

The following is a partial quotation from the  NYT editorial, published March 18, 2022.  For more details follow the link shown below.

"By The Editorial Board

The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.

For all the tolerance and enlightenment that modern society claims, Americans are losing hold of a fundamental right as citizens of a free country: the right to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned.

This social silencing, this depluralizing of America, has been evident for years, but dealing with it stirs yet more fear. It feels like a third rail, dangerous. For a strong nation and open society, that is dangerous.

How has this happened? In large part, it’s because the political left and the right are caught in a destructive loop of condemnation and recrimination around cancel culture. Many on the left refuse to acknowledge that cancel culture exists at all, believing that those who complain about it are offering cover for bigots to peddle hate speech. Many on the right, for all their braying about cancel culture, have embraced an even more extreme version of censoriousness as a bulwark against a rapidly changing society, with laws that would ban books, stifle teachers and discourage open discussion in classrooms.

Many Americans are understandably confused, then, about what they can say and where they can say it. People should be able to put forward viewpoints, ask questions and make mistakes and take unpopular but good-faith positions on issues that society is still working through — all without fearing cancellation.

However you define cancel culture, Americans know it exists and feel its burden. In a new national poll commissioned by Times Opinion and Siena College, only 34 percent of Americans said they believed that all Americans enjoyed freedom of speech completely. The poll found that 84 percent of adults said it is a “very serious” or “somewhat serious” problem that some Americans do not speak freely in everyday situations because of fear of retaliation or harsh criticism.

This poll and other recent surveys from the Pew Research Center and the Knight Foundation reveal a crisis of confidence around one of America’s most basic values. Freedom of speech and expression is vital to human beings’ search for truth and knowledge about our world. A society that values freedom of speech can benefit from the full diversity of its people and their ideas. At the individual level, human beings cannot flourish without the confidence to take risks, pursue ideas and express thoughts that others might reject.

Most important, freedom of speech is the bedrock of democratic self-government. If people feel free to express their views in their communities, the democratic process can respond to and resolve competing ideas. Ideas that go unchallenged by opposing views risk becoming weak and brittle rather than being strengthened by tough scrutiny. When speech is stifled or when dissenters are shut out of public discourse, a society also loses its ability to resolve conflict, and it faces the risk of political violence.

There’s a crisis around the freedom of speech now because many people don’t understand it, they weren’t taught what it means and why it matters,” said Suzanne Nossel, the chief executive of PEN America, a free speech organization. “Safeguards for free speech have been essential to almost all social progress in the country, from the civil rights movement to women’s suffrage to the current fights over racial justice and the police.”

Times Opinion commissioned the poll to provide more data and insight that can inform a debate mired in extremes. This editorial board plans to identify a wide range of threats to freedom of speech in the coming months and to offer possible solutions. Freedom of speech requires not just a commitment to openness and tolerance in the abstract. It demands conscientiousness about both the power of speech and its potential harms. We believe it isn’t enough for Americans to just believe in the rights of others to speak freely; they should also find ways to actively support and protect those rights.

We are under no illusion that this is easy. Our era, especially, is not made for this; social media is awash in speech of the point-scoring, picking-apart, piling-on, put-down variety. A deluge of misinformation and disinformation online has heightened this tension. Making the internet a more gracious place does not seem high on anyone’s agenda, and certainly not for most of the tech companies that control it.

But the old lesson of “think before you speak” has given way to the new lesson of “speak at your peril.” You can’t consider yourself a supporter of free speech and be policing and punishing speech more than protecting it. Free speech demands a greater willingness to engage with ideas we dislike and greater self-restraint in the face of words that challenge and even unsettle us.

It is worth noting here the important distinction between what the First Amendment protects (freedom from government restrictions on expression) and the popular conception of free speech (the affirmative right to speak your mind in public, on which the law is silent). The world is witnessing, in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the strangling of free speech through government censorship and imprisonment. That is not the kind of threat to freedom of expression that Americans face. Yet something has been lost; the poll clearly shows a dissatisfaction with free speech as it is experienced and understood by Americans today."

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/18/opinion/cancel-culture-free-speech-poll.html

 

NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH COMES OUT OF THE MOUTH OF BABES AND THEN?

 I listened to the words expressed by a small child in the video linked below, and I thought you might enjoy it too.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y62veCinCvc

  How is that so much wisdom and truth exhibited by young children (Babes), prior to their formal education, turns them often into illogical and unfriendly individuals, as they grow-up?  I can only suspect that too many of the educators (adults), the media (television and movies), religions and politics poison the minds of the next generation.  When one is fortunate enough to live a long live, one can easily observe the degeneration of a society over the years observed.  Politicians, in so called democratic societies, do their utmost to divide citizens into different camps, in order to achieve their goals for control and enrichment of themselves.  Once their powers are established, the citizenry is further subjected to brainwashing to get them to obey orders no matter how ridiculous they may be.  We could observe this, especially during the last two years, were manufactured fears were  employed to play the game 'Simon Says'.  Unfortunately, religions of the world are not helping either, often they also divide the peoples of the world.

Now we learn, what many of us suspected all along, that all of these 'COVID' mandates by the Governments of the world, had little or no significant effect on the outcome of the pandemic.  Businesses and lives were destroyed for the sake of manufacturing great fears among the people, to ensure a brisk vaccine business to follow.

https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/national/coronavirus/johns-hopkins-university-study-finds-lockdowns-only-reduced-covid-deaths-by-0-2

Sadly, this self-serving  system, employed by people in power, ensures the intellectual and moral decline of a once humanistic society; the innocent babes are morphing into the ugly product of a corrupt and illogical system.  We have experienced the breakup of longstanding friendships between friends and neighbors, and relationships among relatives, etc.

The time has come to rethink our position in the world, and find ways to undo the damage political and religious organizations have inflicted onto mankind all over the globe, and revert to the smart and honest individuals we once were during our very early childhood.

 

 

IVERMECTIN, THE INEXPENSIVE GENERIC DRUG OUTPERFORMS SUPER EXPENIVE FDA APPROVED REMDESIVIR

 In a recent peer reviewed study, from  Miami U.S., it is clear again beyond a shadow of a doubt that Ivermectin should have been the preferred drug of choice for a long, long time, but apparently, because of profit expectations, by BigPharma and friends, it was maligned every step of the way.  History may show that millions of people, in the world, were left to die without proper medical care, for the sake of profits all around.

I think it is best to let the renown Dr. John Campbell do the talking.  By following the link below, you can just do that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfyOihhAD4A

This expensive money making machine, called Remdesivir (240 pounds per vial), is in fact a dangerous drug, according to some, to the point that some countries don't allow the usage of this drug, if my memory serves me right.  To my surprise, now even the

"WHO recommends against the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients"

"WHO has issued a conditional recommendation against the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients, regardless of disease severity, as there is currently no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients."

https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-recommends-against-the-use-of-remdesivir-in-covid-19-patients 

Miracles never seize to happen.

Needless to say, some unfortunate patients paid with their lives because this useless drug was used with Covid-19 patients, in lieu of Ivermectin and other existing off'-label drugs, which were more effective than Remdesivir.  The only thing this drug had over Ivermectin, and others was, it made big money.

The retail price of remdesivir in the U.S. was set by Gilead at $520 a dose. A typical treatment course requiring six or more doses costs thousands of dollars per patient.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/11/20/937018585/who-trial-finds-remdesivir-has-no-meaningful-effect-in-covid-19-patients 

 

WHAT THE HECK IS BILL SAYING?

 Bill Gates is saddened by the fact that the Omicron variant is doing a better job than all the vaccines have done so far, and I might add, injuring and killing fewer people by far.  The far less dangerous Omicron virus is providing solid immunity, as it spreads, like lightening, all over the world, and that without destroying the world economy.  One might be inclined to think that the fact that we have more vaccines in stock than we have a demand for, according to Bill, could make a businessman like him sad because these vaccines have a short shelf live, which means that not too long from now they must be destroyed, at a loss.  What a bummer!

A genuine human would be delighted that Omicron is the best vaccine of all, medically and economically speaking.  it serves all equally without any costs associated with it.  It serves the poor countries with the same free immunity, as it does the rich ones.  A little while back, Dr. John Day said that the Omicron virus is the best vaccine out there, and Bill Gates seems to agree with him.  What a twist this is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNc9PqIZ31M

As I said before, the truth will always find it's way to the light of day.

 

 

 

 

"The Truth Exposed with Dr. Peter McCullough"

"The Truth Exposed with Dr. Peter McCullough"

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=US343EgQ0FU

By watching this video one will learn the following.

Note: VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Reporting System by HHS.gov.  (Health and Human Services)

200 Million vaccinations resulted in 1 million adverse reactions causing injuries that is 1 in 200, or 0.5%.  Ref. https://vaers.hhs.gov/

20,000 killed so far by the vaccines.  Ref. https://vaers.hhs.gov/

40,000 permanently disabled.

Due to gross under-reporting by agencies, the number killed by these vaccines, according to some sources, could be a high as 180,000.

Apparently, Vaers' records reflect under-reporting, by a factor between 4 and 5, according to some it is 20-fold.  One thing is clear official counts are understated, the question is at what factor?

50% die within hours, while 80% die within a week of vaccination.

All prior vaccines throughout history combined caused only about 150 deaths.

Current vaccines install the production of Spike Proteins.

The vaccine produced Spike Proteins can cause Blood-Clots, as experienced by some.

Spike Proteins can aid in the formation of cancers.

Heart infections are now 400 per Million (CDC reports about 21,000)

WHO now advises against Booster Shots.

It is likely that ultimately the brain will be most affected, in the future.

95% of all hospitalizations were avoidable.

VAERS has about 4 to 5 times under-reporting, some claim a 20 fold factor.

Who is Peter McCullough MD, MPH?

Taken from Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_A._McCullough

"Early life and education

Peter Andrew McCullough was born in Buffalo, New York, on December 29, 1962.^[7] He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Baylor University in 1984 and his medical degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in 1988.^[8] He completed his residency in internal medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle, a cardiology fellowship in 1991, and practiced internal medicine in Grayling, Michigan, for two years before enrolling in the University of Michigan School of Public Health, earning a master of public health (MPH) degree in 1994.^[7][9]

Career

After receiving his MPH, McCullough was a cardiovascular fellow at William Beaumont Hospital in the Detroit metropolitan area until 1997. He then worked successively at the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute in Detroit until 2000, served as section chief of cardiology of the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, and returned to William Beaumont Hospital where he worked from 2002 to 2010.^[7] He spent the next four years as chief academic and scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System, Detroit, before joining the Baylor University Medical Center in 2014.^[7][9] McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.^[10][11][5]

McCullough is a founder and current president of the Cardio Renal Society of America^[9][12] and co-editor-in-chief of the society's journal, Cardiorenal Medicine^[13] and editor of the journal Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.^[14][15] He has conducted several studies on running and heart disease,^[16] and co-described the term Phidippides cardiomyopathy, a heart condition found in some high endurance athletes.^[17][18][19] Other research has included the relationship between heart disease and kidney disease^[20] and risk factors for heart disease.^[21] He is a member of the conservative advocacy group Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.^[22][3]

COVID-19

During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough advocated for early treatment including hydroxychloroquine,^[23][24] criticized the response of the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration,^[23] dissented from public health recommendations, and contributed to COVID-19 misinformation.^[25][26][27]

Early outpatient treatment advocacy

In April 2020, McCullough led a study of the medication hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 for the Baylor Scott & White Medical Center. McCullough told The Wall Street Journal that the urgency of the public health crisis justified compromises on best practices in medical research.^[28][29] In July, after major studies found hydroxychloroquine was ineffective against COVID-19 and the Food and Drug Administration revoked its emergency use authorization (EUA), McCullough supported a second EUA.^[23]

McCullough, Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, and co-authors published an observational study proposing an early outpatient treatment regimen for COVID-19 in August 2020 in the American Journal of Medicine.^[30] Based on previous evidence, the article made recommendations for treating ambulatory COVID-19 patients, but presented no new evidence. The article was shared on social media, mainly by groups which had previously published COVID-19 misinformation, in posts falsely interpreting the publication as an endorsement of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19.^[31][32][33] The Ministry of Health of Brazil endorsed the article on its website, contributing to a severe COVID-19 misinformation problem in Brazil.^[31][34][35] The article was criticized in letters to the editors;^{[36][37][38][39][40]} the editors responded that the article included some "hopeful speculations...What seemed reasonable last summer based on laboratory experiments has subsequently been shown to be untrue."^[32][35]

McCullough and Risch were two of three witnesses called by committee chair Senator Ron Johnson to testify before a United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on COVID-19 treatments held in November 2020. McCullough testified in support of social distancing, vaccination, and treatments, including hydroxychloroquine. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, called to testify by the ranking member, said the "clear consensus in the medical and scientific community, based on overwhelming evidence" is that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective as a treatment for COVID-19. McCullough said Jha was promoting misinformation and Jha's opposition to the drug was "reckless and dangerous for the nation."^{[24][41][42][43]} Jha responded on The New York Times opinion page, "By elevating witnesses who sound smart but endorse unfounded therapies, we risk jeopardizing a century's work of medical progress."^[44]

COVID-19 misinformation

Some of McCullough's public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation.^[4][5]

McCullough testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.^[25]

Posted on the Canadian online video sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.^[45] In May 2021, McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were "inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence", including that survivors cannot be re-infected and so do not require vaccination and that the vaccines are dangerous.^[26]

During television appearances, McCullough has contradicted public health recommendations, including when asked about the aggressive spread of COVID-19 among children, by suggesting that healthy persons under 30 had no need for a vaccine,^[27][46] and when asked about the relative merits of vaccination-induced immunity versus "natural" (survivor) immunity, by disputing the necessity of vaccinations to achieve herd immunity.^{[4][22][47][48]"}

^{It appears that the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is universally ignored, in order to punish law abiding Citizens for expressing their opinions.  This is not what the founding fathers had in mind!  Moreover, it is more and more apparent that he was and is still right.}

 

TO IVERMECTIN OR NOT... THAT IS THE QUESTION

 It seems, there are doctors that tell their patients, for one reason or another that the drug Ivermectin should not be used for the treatment of COVID-19 because it is a neurotoxin for humans and should therefore be avoided.  As usual, one can find many partially conflicting writings on this subject, and I thought, now is the time to examine this issue.

"Ivermectin

Mark G. Papich DVM, MS, DACVCP, in Papich Handbook of Veterinary Drugs (Fifth Edition), 2021

Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug of the avermectin class. It is a prototype for this class of antiparasitic agents, which also includes eprinomectin and milbemycins (milbemycin and moxidectin). These drugs are macrocyclic lactones and share many similarities, including mechanism of action. These drugs are neurotoxic to parasites by potentiating glutamate-gated chloride ion channels in parasites. Paralysis and death of the parasite are caused by increased permeability to chloride ions and hyperpolarization of nerve cells. These drugs also potentiate other chloride channels, including ones gated by GABA. Mammals ordinarily are not affected because they lack glutamate-gated chloride channels, and there is a lower affinity for other mammalian chloride channels. Because these drugs ordinarily do not penetrate the blood–brain barrier, GABA-gated channels in the CNS of mammals are not affected. Ivermectin is active against intestinal parasites, mites, bots, heartworm microfilaria, and developing larvae. Ivermectin can also produce heartworm adulticide effects when administered long term. Ivermectin has no effect on trematode or cestode parasites.

Ivermectin has a prolonged half-life in all the animals studied, which allows for infrequent administration to achieve clinical effects."  Emphasis added.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/veterinary-science-and-veterinary-medicine/ivermectin 

I take this to mean that ordinarily, Ivermectin is not a neurotoxin to Mammals, which includes also the human species.   Other writers say that Ivermectin in high doses might become a neurotoxin for humans, but stress that this is not the case with doctor prescribed doses, whereby Ivermectin does not cross the brain barrier, and is successfully removed from the Central Nervous System (CNS).

"Whom to believe

The politicians and heads of public health agencies have pledged to “follow the science.” Are they following the science when it comes to ivermectin and other off-label drugs? Whom should you believe?

According to many, the battle against ivermectin is because of federal restrictions contained in the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulations. They prohibit new, not fully tested drugs from use if there are other “adequate, approved and available alternatives.” Big pharma would rather sell you $3,000 per dose remdesivir than $1-2 ivermectin, fluvoxamine, or hydroxychloroquine.

Daniel Horowitz said of ivermectin: “to suggest that it is not safe is a scandalous lie.” He went on: “precisely at the time when the shots are wearing off, the FDA not only quasi-approved the vaccine, but picked the leakiest of all to greenlight and also authorized emergency use of a third shot … of the same failed substance.”"

https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/battle-over-whom-to-believe-about-ivermectin/

 

"Over 25 Years of Clinical Experience With Ivermectin: An Overview of Safety for an Increasing Number of Indications"

Leon H Kircik, James Q Del Rosso, Alison M Layton, Jürgen Schauber

• PMID: 26954318

"Abstract

Although the broad-spectrum anti-parasitic effects of the avermectin derivative ivermectin are well documented, its anti-inflammatory activity has only recently been demonstrated. For over 25 years, ivermectin has been used to treat parasitic infections in mammals, with a good safety profile that may be attributed to its high affinity to invertebrate neuronal ion channels and its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier in humans and other mammals. Numerous studies report low rates of adverse events, as an oral treatment for parasitic infections, scabies and head lice. Ivermectin has been used off-label to treat diseases associated with Demodex mites, such as blepharitis and demodicidosis. New evidence has linked Demodex mites to rosacea, a chronic inflammatory disease. Ivermectin has recently received FDA and EU approval for the treatment of adult patients with inflammatory lesions of rosacea, a disease in which this agent has been shown to be well tolerated. After more than 25 years of use, ivermectin continues to provide a high margin of safety for a growing number of indications based on its anti-parasitic and anti-inflammatory activities."   Emphasis added.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26954318/

This author also states that "... its [Ivermectin] inability to cross the blood-brain barrier in humans and other mammals.", makes Ivermectin safe.  The belief that Ivermectin is a Neurotoxin for humans, without heavy overdosing appears to be without foundation in fact.

 

"Clinical applications of topical ivermectin in dermatology

Omid Zargari, Nessa Aghazadeh  ¹ , Fatemeh Moeineddin

Affiliations

• PMID: 28329606

"Abstract

Ivermectin (IVM) is a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug with significant anti-inflammatory properties. The emergence of treatment resistance to lindane, permethrin, and possibly malathion complicates the global strategy for management of common parasitic skin diseases such as scabies and head lice. In this regard. IVM [Ivermectin] has been safely and effectively used in the treatment of these common human infestations. In addition, IVM may be useful in inflammatory cutaneous disorders such as papulopustular rosacea where demodex may play a role in pathogenesis. Herein, we review the current applications of topical IVM in dermatology."  Emphasis added.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28329606/ 

No mention of Ivermectin being a Neurotoxin.

 

• Find Studies
• About Studies
• Submit Studies
• Resources
• About Site
• PRS Login

• Home
• Search Results
• Study Record Detail

Save this study

"Ivermectin Treatment in Patients With Onchocerciasis-associated Epilepsy (OAETREAT)"

It is my understanding that Ivermectin is very helpful for children who suffer Epileptic seizures.

"Can ivermectin cause neurological problems?

Ivermectin can also cause human neurotoxicity by interacting with inhibitory GABA receptors in the brain. Fortunately, ivermectin taken at therapeutic doses does not effectively cross the blood-brain barrier because it is pumped out of the CNS by the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter.  Nov 23, 2021"  Emphasis added.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=children+epileptic+conditions+treated+with+Ivermectin 

 

 

 THE BIG LIE? ... The song the FDA sings.

"There seems to be a growing interest in a drug called ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans. Certain animal formulations of ivermectin such as pour-on, injectable, paste, and "drench," are approved in the U.S. to treat or prevent parasites in animals. For humans, ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses to treat some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.

However, the FDA has received multiple reports of patients who have required medical attention, including hospitalization, after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for livestock."

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 

We know for a fact that Ivermectin is an FDA approved drug, save for humans in a number of applications.  It is also used off-label by Doctors if in their judgement it is justified.  So why this theatrics by the FDA?  For one, about 70% of their operating budget comes from Big Pharma, and who wants to bite the hand that feeds them?  Big Pharma currently scores big profits with their nearly useless experimental COVID vaccines.  These rushed vaccines got their emergency use authorization only by denying the fact that other helpful drugs were available.  For this reason, they had to malign any other drug found effective against the COVID VIRUS.  Get it?

It is a really amazing feat to have all Hospitals and most Doctors all fall in line to support the Big Lie of Big Pharma.  While the vaccine development and trials were ongoing for months, innocent sick patients were sent home, apparently, without any treatments of any kind, including drugs like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.  Apparently, nor were they educated about the importance of Vitamin D3, Zinc and others.  I read some time ago that apparently 80% of people who lost the battle, were Vitamin D3 deficient.  In the final analysis, by acting as they did, the Medical Industrial Complex is responsible for the deaths of many, many thousands.  Many countries are complicit in this human and economic tragedy going on to this day.

 

"Therapeutic Advances:

A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.

Conclusions:

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/ 

 

 

 

 https://covid19criticalcare.com/

"A group of world-renowned doctors and scientists brought truth to power in Washington, D.C. this weekend, at a Sunday march attended by tens of thousands and at a lively round table discussion on Monday.  Read the Article"

"For more information about the FLCCC Alliance and our Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19, please visit www.flccc.net"

 

"Safety of Ivermectin

Standard doses of ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg x 1–2 days) have a nearly unparalleled safety profile historically among medicines as evidenced by the following findings:
 WHO Guidelines for Scabies: “the majority of side effects are minor and transient”
 Prof Jacques Descotes, Toxicologist, Expert on Safety of Ivermectin: “severe adverse events are unequivocally and exceedingly rare”
 LiverTox Database: Not considered toxic to the liver
 Nephrotox Database- Not considered toxic to the kidney
 PneumoTox: Not considered toxic to the lungs

Safety of High Dose Ivermectin
In COVID-19, particularly in regard to the emerging variants of concern, viral loads are higher and viral replication is thought to be prolonged. Given that ivermectin has demonstrated a strong dose-response relationship in terms of viral clearance, higher doses have not only been required, but have demonstrated clinical efficacy. Below are hyperlinked references to numerous studies demonstrating the wide safety profile of high dose ivermectin in COVID and other diseases."

"COVID-19 Studies
1) Randomized controlled trial of ivermectin in COVID using 0.6mg/kg x 5 days reported no differences in side effects.
2) Randomized controlled trial, with 3 arms; one arm treated with 1.2 mg/kg for 5 days, and another treated with 0.6mg/kg for 5 days with no differences in side effects
3) A report by the State Health Minister on 3,000 patients in La Pampa, Argentina who were part of a “test and treat” program were given 0.6 mg/kg daily for 5 days. Liver function tests and significant side effects were closely monitored and none were reported.
4) A report by the Health Minister in Misiones, Argentina, also using 0.6 mg/kg for 5 days with no significant adverse events reported.

Malaria Studies
1) Safety trial of patients with malaria given 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 mg/kg daily of ivermectin for 7 days was well tolerated with no adverse events
2) Study of “Efficacy and Safety of High dose ivermectin for Reducing Malaria Transmission” compared 0, 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg for 3 days and found no differences in side effects."

Healthy Volunteers
1) Report of a group of healthy adult subjects given up to 10 x standard dose, either 2-4x the standard dose three times a week or 6–10x standard dose once and found the doses generally well tolerated.
Systematic Reviews
1) A systematic review and meta-analysis of high dose ivermectin found no difference in side effects between dose of up to 0.4 mg/kg and higher doses (up to 0.8 mg/kg doses every 3 months.
2) A comprehensive review of 350 articles by the famous French toxicologist Jacques Descotes was presented in early 2021. In this document, he states,
a. “Based on all the data presented above, the author of this report believes it is fair to say that ivermectin did not directly induce an excess of deaths in treated groups of human subjects. Statements, past or present, that ivermectin can kill patients, are therefore considered to be misleading as they do not take into account all the medical information that has been accumulated over the last decades.“
b. “Only very few cases of accidental human overdose have been reported despite the wide availability of ivermectin as a veterinary and human medicine [Hall et al., 1985;Graeme et al., 2000; Deraemecker et al., 2014; Goossens et al., 2014].
Usually, moderate neurotoxic manifestations with rapid recovery after unspecific supportive measures were the predominating course of events. No accidental overdose including in infants and young children had a lethal outcome."  Emphasis added.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/FLCCC-Information-Evidence-for-Safety-of-Ivermectin.pdf 

 

There you have it.  It is for you to decide whom you want to believe.

 

Your comments, if any, will always be very much appreciated.