VACCINATION RISK VS BENEFIT IN QUESTION

The following study shows that real-life data support, with 95% confidence, twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19.  When using drugs like Ivermectin for early treatment, the risk of death by vaccination ratio would be even higher, in my opinion.

The following quotations are excerpts from the study referred to below.

 "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy"

 by Harald Walach, Rainer J. Klement and Wouter Aukema.

"Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital, 60-572 Poznan, Poland2Department of Psychology, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany3Change Health Science Institute, 10178 Berlin, Germany4Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany;rainer_klement@gmx.de5Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg 1, 7351 BD Hoenderloo, The Netherlands;"

From the Abstract

"Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000(95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. "

NNTV = Number Needed To Vaccinate; ADR = Adverse Drug Reactions; CI = Confidence Interval (95% under the Normal (Gaussian) Curve, or four Standard Deviations about the Mean)

"Thus, we need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination,
we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and,in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case,we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."

"The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and, in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case, we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."  Emphasis added.

https://thefatemperor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Safety-of-COVID-19-Vaccinations%E2%80%94We-Should-Rethink-the-Policy.pdf

Link provided by Dr. John Day.

It should be obvious, for some time, that the entire vaccination campaign is questionable at best; it destroys the lives of too many people (short and long-term, as well as death), with little to show for but sinful profits for a few.

 

 

VACCINATION TURNS INTO MAGNETIC ATTRACTION ...?

 

The following was translated from a "Study on electromagnetism of vaccinated persons in Luxembourg". 

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Above link provided by Dr. John Day.

Translated from the French text. 
Please ignore minor grammatical errors, the result of translation.

Étude sur l’électromagnétisme des personnes vaccinées au Luxembourg

• Florent
• 20 juin 2021
• Manipulations & Gouvernance mondiale, Santé

Summary presentation of the results for the study week from June 1 to June 5, 2021:

Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated people were finally interviewed, whereas the aim was to interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.

The condition of gender distribution has been met. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were interviewed.
    In the group of unvaccinated, of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people with magnet attraction is 0 (zero). So the experience stops there for this group.
    In the group of vaccinated, on the other hand, of the 30 individuals interviewed, 29 have an attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adheres to their skin without difficulty. All of them are vaccinated in vaccinodrome.

NB: The 30th person, who does not have a hook on the magnet, was not vaccinated in vaccinodrome like all the others. She was vaccinated by a nurse with whom she has worked for many years.

Of these 29 individuals, 22 have the magnet that adhere to a single shoulder and only to the area of the injection. These 22 people are the ones who received only one injection.

The other 7 people in this same group have the magnet that adhere on both shoulders.

    In this group, known as vaccinated, domiciled or working in Luxembourg, it appears that:
    17 received at least one injection from pfizer laboratory
    7 received at least one injection from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    3 received at least one injection from the Moderna laboratory
    3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
    6 received all 2 injections from the Pfizer laboratory
    1 received the 2 injections from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    1 received all 2 injections from the Moderna laboratory

 2 of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, had totally abnormal electric field emissions. For the nurse, a video was even made that shows the values emitted by the tester around his left shoulder. For the analyst, the values issued by the tester were approximately the same but the individual abruptly ended his participation under the effect of panic.  Of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 live or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives in Metz but works in Strassen.

It would appear that people who were vaccinated earlier in the government vaccination program are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds much better than in freshly vaccinated people.  More specific measures should be taken in relation to the latter finding.

Note: The exercise is totally destabilizing for the people interviewed, at no time are they asked to apply the magnet to any area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know if the magnet also adheres to the areas of the neck, chest, forehead or legs as well as whether other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhere. This is not feasible in public spaces.

Conclusion:

It appears that vaccinated people do indeed give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier individuals have been vaccinated, the stronger they release a field. This sensation and appreciation, which is only a matter of the tactile experience at the application and the removal of the magnet at the shoulder, should be checked much more accurately, on a larger number of people and with much more accurate devices.

It has been extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play the game of this rather destabilizing experience.

Individuals are interested in the experience out of curiosity and then, when they see that the magnet clings to their skin, they become doubtful at first, then suddenly they become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous not to say that they seem to be completely in shock.

People sincerely wonder how it is possible that a magnet can adhere to their skin as easily as it adheres to a metal pole.

They ask for explanations and the investigator reassures them that there must be a physical or biological explanation. They are referred to the doctor who advised them to be injected for understanding.

One lady even cried when she said that she did not want to be vaccinated but that she was forced to do so by her employer who forced her to do so on the pretext that she works in contact with customers.

In the discussions, it emerges that people do not even vaccinate themselves for medical or health reasons, nor out of conviction or fear of the disease, but more often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.

During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying after the fact that they are being held hostage in a political and psychosocial spiral. Many acknowledge that this injection is not consented to and that at no time have they been given rational explanations (according to the Oviedo Convention), i.e. an insight from the point of view of the balance between benefits and risks and explicit information as to the very composition of the vials used for injections. They then describe, after reflection and discussion, this act as: "error, madness, escape, solution, or even blackmail".

It is exactly these terms that came up very often in testimonies and notes.

Again, a much more thorough psychosocial investigation should be carried out into the real motives that led these vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected. The ideal would be to be able to record and film all the conversations, interviews and spontaneous exchanges with the vaccinated and then analyze them.

The investigation is stopped for reasons of conscience and morality because the investigator can no longer cope with the distress and helplessness of people whose faces petrify when they realize that they have been injected with a substance of which they ultimately know nothing.

The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, is very uncomfortable with these people who wonder about what is happening to them.

People become pale, white, nervous. They put a hand towards the forehead or cross their arms, pinching their lower lips. Some sweat from their hands because we see them wiped on their hips or thighs.

These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or truly palpable and measurable tension.

Among the interviewees, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep unhappiness when they realize after the fact that they have undoubtedly committed the irreparable.

The act of vaccination is, of course, an irreversible act.

In short:
To the question, is it true that people have an effect of electromagnetism after having undergone at least one act of vaccination? The answer is yes. Indeed, individuals become well electromagnetic on minimal injection zone.

To the question, what is injected into individuals and which causes this effect?

We reply that it is up to the governments and authorities guaranteeing public health and the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question because it is they who, upstream, took the heavy decision to "vaccinate" healthy populations with the help of "vaccines" still at the experimental stage and including, during clinical trials , all hamsters are dead.

We will not answer here for the responsibility of each other, but it is certain that if superparamagnetic nanoparticles (magnetic beads) have entered the composition of these so-called vaccines, on an experimental basis or for whatever reason whatsoever, whereas until then these were reserved only for anticancer therapies, then it is urgent to ask for a development , as soon as possible, to the pharmaceutical laboratories and health authorities which have given their authorisation for the placing on the market of these injections.

It is up to the toxicologists and pharmacologists who are now responsible for discovering the origins and causes of these attraction effects observed on vaccinated subjects and it is up to the politicians, who are the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country, to call very quickly for a thorough and public inquiry to be opened into the exact and actual composition of these so-called vaccines.

PS: 2 sites and 1 interesting working document to consult that deal with nano solutions and ferrofluids:

http://www.chemicell.com/

s://www.acrobiosystems.com/

https://bioperoxil.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/pdf/2018_03_30_Conf_Nano_Club_Condorcet.pdf

Are the vaccinated ones really magnetized? Experience and supply of Spike coupled with magnetic beads.

Source: https://lilianeheldkhawam.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/etude-sur-lattraction-magnetisme.docx"

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Although this is, in my opinion, a crude, small ad-hog study it seems, nevertheless, it makes one wonder what the intended, or unintended consequence of this magnetic field, at the injection site, is?

 

 

 

 

WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?

It is my understanding that by design, the Lipid Nano-Particles are to remain at the injection site, where they are supposed to do their job.  These lipids are not meant to wander all over the inside our bodies, posing a clear and present danger to some of our vital organs.  Turns out, this unwanted lipid behavior was known, early last year from a Chinese report, and apparently, talked about by the inner circle, of the controlling interests, who apparently, decided to withhold this knowledge, probably for fear of stepping on the Vaccine brake.

Discussion between (left to right) Dr. Robert Malone, Inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, Dr. Bret Weinstein, PhD Evolutionary Biology, and Steve Kirsch, Serial entrepreneur.

While for most organ tissues, the total lipid concentration ml decreased after some hours, as shown on the graph, as the material diffuses unexpectedly into the body.  The Bone Marrow and the Ovaries saw an increase in concentration, after about 4 hours following injection.  After 48 hours the concentrations for these were still on the rise, this, most likely, cannot be a good thing.  Finally, having unexpected free spike proteins circulating in our bodies, is less than comforting; it is quite dangerous in fact, considering possible future medical problems of all kinds.  So-called COVID-19 'Long Haulers' are perhaps the early warning signal, of things to come.

The discussion panel agreed at the end, one can get always vaccinated but cannot be unvaccinated, should problems arise.

As an aside, from what I know, the person injecting the material should first aspirate following insertion of the needle, to ensure no vein was punctured by accident; not once did I see this common sense procedure followed.  If by chance a blood vessel were punctured the injected material would enter the bloodstream directly; i.e. it becomes a main-liner which probably spells trouble. 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4

 

Based on the findings shown on the above graph, in another discussion the same panel discussed the "Informed consent and reproductive toxicity of vaccines (Robert Malone)".  The consensus was that they would not recommend vaccination, especially of young women.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMxuNvVgxlU

Background:

"mRNA vaccines rely on the delivery of mRNA into the cytoplasm of host cells, where it can be transcribed into antigenic proteins to trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies. However, mRNA is three to four orders of magnitude larger than molecules that readily diffuse into cells; in addition, the dense negative charge of mRNA electrostatically repulses the anionic cell membrane, preventing its uptake. Therefore, mRNA vaccines require a delivery vehicle that not only protects the nucleic acid from degradation but allows the mRNA to get into cells."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41578-021-00281-4  

"mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the vaccine. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus."

https://www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/HealthU/2021/01/11/a-simple-breakdown-of-the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/ 

We already know that fully vaccinated individuals (so called protected people) got infected with the real thing, and became sick, ranging from lightly sick to very ill; some unfortunately even died.  The numbers may be considered very small, in the eyes of faithful risk-takers but for non-gamblers the odds may be too high to experience serious complications, not to speak of actually dying.  Further, we also know that some people who had recovered from Covid-19, and achieved therefore natural immunity, when vaccinated later, ran into real problems because of the vaccine.  Equally, there are those who ended up with serious health issues following their vaccinations; 'Long Haulers' they call them.

At this time, there are no definitive answers to the question, WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?  Producers of these vaccines are playing their cards close to their chest; they deny and/or stonewall any  inquiries regarding observed adverse reactions and consequences, caused by their products.

More and more we hear from people who prefer to resign from their jobs, when their employers demand their vaccinations.  I know of one doctor who put his management on notice that should they make vaccination mandatory, he will resign.  I suppose he understands the dangers of these half-baked vaccines, better than most of us.

Apparently, a leaked internal report from Astra-Zeneca claims that the death rate, per million, of the  other vaccine (Pfizer) was higher than their own.  See the images shown below.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO3g0jCO6v8&t=46s

It is safe to assume that the actual death rates per million are much higher because of apparent deliberate under-reporting.  So much information has been and still is hidden from the public, such as the more serious side effects and the strange, unexpected diffusion of injected material into organ tissues, as discussed above, for example.  Also, the suppression of viable drugs, like Ivermectin and others, speaks volumes; refusing to treat patients early, thus increasing the number of ICU cases, and deaths enforces the Angst (existential fear) among the population, thus ensuring vaccination compliance, ensuring the mega transfer of tax dollars to Big Pharma and friends.  We are told over and over, the vaccinations are free; they are not!

Israel reported a probable link between Pfizer vaccine and 'Myocarditis' (Heart muscle inflammation), following injections.  In fact, 275 cases were recorded between December 2020 and May 2021, out of about five million vaccinations.  This computes to 55 cases per million.  "Severe myocarditis weakens the heart and forms clots which even lead to a stroke or heart attack."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PRScVeHt7k

Note:

You can get your Ivermectin prescription through one of the doctors listed on the FLCCC portal using the link below.  I suggest having this drug on hand, should you become infected.  The cost is about $115 doctor fee plus whatever the pharmacy charges (about $90 for 5 day regimen).  Is is inexpensive, considering you will be, most likely, virus free in about a week.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

 

Last but not least, I highly recommend watching the video testimony before a Texas Senate HHS committee, by Peter McCullough, MD, a more than qualified expert witness.  I have addressed, in my previous posts, the same issues, the lack of early treatment, doctors hiding behind FDA's, NIH's illogical pronouncements against the use of off-label drugs for early treatment, Social Media's blocking anything said, or written in favor of early home treatments with available approved drugs, etc., etc.

While I was touching on most of these issues in one way or another previously, Dr McCullough does it so much better; please learn, from an expert, about our total medical system failure, at all levels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM 

 

 

 

 

 

"Fauci, Facebook: Pandemic show in policy must go on"

 The following article, written By Melih Altınok, was taken from the 'Daily Sabah' - Turkish News. 

"Facebook's changing policies on pandemic censorship and leaked emails make people think about scenarios. It seems like the pandemic theater will continue in the post-Trump America"

"During the pandemic, there has been intense censorship applied to the scientific theses that the World Health Organization (WHO) did not "recognize." Various scientific arguments about the function of isolation measurements or the safety of treatment methods were restricted on the internet.

Social media platforms, which supposedly broke the property relations of conventional media and opened space for freedom of expression, became the implementers of this shameful global censorship.

However, Facebook, one of the members of the modern inquisition we are talking about, recently made a surprising decision and announced that it will no longer censor posts that contain claims that the virus may be lab-made.

While it has become apparent who pulls the strings of it during the pandemic, we do not know why Facebook made this statement, which is in a sense a confession.

Predictions imply that Facebook is preparing for a new global scenario, just like in the coronavirus process.

I don't know if you are one of those who still say "these are conspiracy theories" after what we have witnessed for a year. However, the possibility of starting a propaganda process in which the entire bill will be charged to China does not seem utopian to me.

Or, to put it simply, we can count this move as an indicator of Facebook's effort to adapt to the burning facts that will emerge about the pandemic process.

Fauci’s role

The revelations have already begun. An extremely important example is about Dr. Anthony Fauci. The emails of the doctor, who is one of the most staunch advocates of the isolation process in the U.S. and the world, were leaked to the press.

As we learned from the news, Fauci, whom was referred to by the former U.S. President Donald Trump as "the U.S. nation is lucky that I did not listen to him," was the person who advised Facebook to censor anti-isolation theses.

In his emails, Fauci wrote that isolation measures such as masks did not work, even though he did not appear in front of the cameras without a double mask.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens as U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during an event to commemorate the 50 millionth COVID-19 shot in Washington, U.S., Feb. 25, 2021. (AP Photo)

It is clearly quackery that Fauci, as a physician and scientist, hides from the public what he knows, lies and proposes measures that he knows will not work.

However, this emerging hypocrisy of Fauci, which incumbent U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris marketed to her voters by stating, "I will get vaccinated if Fauici suggests it, and I will not if Trump says it" is not a personal matter.

Fauci's relationship and responsibility with decision-making mechanisms in the U.S. and around the world increase the importance of the scandal that has emerged. The cost of the harsh isolation measures symbolized by Fauci to the world and humanity is incalculable.

So, what would be the possible effects of this development, which clearly show that the pandemic is being used as a political tool?

Would Fauci and his email friends who are covering the facts, such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg, provide self-criticism for the burdens we have been shouldering as the human family for a year?

You are right. Nothing will change if they come up with self-criticism or not.

However, the goal was partially achieved. Under the pretext of the pandemic, they succeeded in adding the electronic ballots, which it is unclear where they came from, to the closed ballot boxes and eliminating Trump.

It was this strategic goal that mattered. Everything after that is just tactics that can be revised."

https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/fauci-facebook-pandemic-show-in-policy-must-go-on