WILL SANITY EVER RETURN?

In my opinion, macro-planers (read, Think Tanks) of the world needed a process, by which they could harvest mass private information from their unsuspecting suspects, without being accused of using Nazi and/or Stasi methods, to spy on its population. The early Cell phones were, basically, just phones, and as such, these were very dumb, i.e., not suitable for spying and data collection. However, these early phones served to condition the people, for what was to come, ‘Smart Phones’, People pay good money for these smart cell phones, which help ‘Big Brother’ to learn more and more private information, from those ready to post their data. While people, all over the world, are preoccupied with their social media accounts, posting private information, including data about their families, pictures of every description, etc. It was not totally unexpected that Governments were more than tempted to mass store this drove of information, all part of their vision. The beauty of this is, as far as Big Brother is concerned, there is no need to hire data entry clerks, who could squeal, and inform the public about it.

These phones are not inexpensive, and to ensure that their citizens could afford them, since most people are living from paycheck to paycheck, money had to be allocated from other discretionary spending. In days gone by, people used to dress up when going to movies, church, concerts or theaters, these clothes amounted to significant outlay. Hence, these monies could be made available, if the fashion were long lasting Jeans, better yet jeans badly worn with holes and tears, to make this fashionable (acceptable) even longer. The elite, film stars, star singers, etc. started to lead this so-called fashion trend, and guess what, the people had now extra money for ‘Smartphones’, each generation of which, better equipped for data collection. Oh, we were told, these improvements were for our greater enjoyment, however, these new generation phones were designed to better intrude into our once private space, make no mistake about it.

Apparently, communist China insists that everybody has one of these smart phones, and the idea behind it is clear. In more affluent countries, people stand in line to buy the next generation gadget, no matter the price. This allows some Governments to maintain the mirage of free choice.

Will Sanity ever return?

Despite the fact that the COVID Pandemic, once called the pandemic of the unvaccinated, has now become the pandemic of the vaccinated, because significantly more of the vaccinated get now infected, and need hospitalization, while many suffer from the serious side effects of these vaccines. Moreover, we now know, the vaccinated can and will infect others. Knowing all this, the powers that be, are still pushing hard to convince more people to take the ‘jab’. When traveling one might still be forced to take the ‘Jab”, to enter foreign countries.

Washington Post reports, “Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Here’s why.” “For the first time, a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.

Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted, according to an analysis conducted for The Health 202 by Cynthia Cox, vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/vaccinated-people-now-make-up-majority-covid-deaths/

KFF reports: “Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now?”

“The share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen. In fall 2021, about 3 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted. But by January 2022, as we showed in an analysis posted on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, about 4 in 10 deaths were vaccinated or boosted. By April 2022, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data show that about 6 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted, and that’s remained true through at least August 2022 (the most recent month of data).” The link shown, shows interesting charts on this topic. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/why-do-vaccinated-people-represent-most-covid-19-deaths-right-now/

The National Library of Medicine contains the following article.

Abstract: “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs”

“The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health. “ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/

Government agencies, including the President, promised, publicly, that these vaccines will protect us from infection, make sure that we cannot infect others, and we will not die, etc., etc. Turns out, none of these promises could be kept because these vaccines were only effective, when it came to destroying our innate immunity.

Will Sanity ever return?

There are many more social issues, affecting all of us, and, in time, some of these will be discussed in future writings.

Twitter Dump Five ... What Do You Think About These Revelations?

 Guess what?  More truth has bubbled to the surface.  These revelations were evidently not fabricated by anyone but came from the records of the camp that spent a lot of time and energy hiding the truth, by censorship, from the public.

Seriously, it is my opinion, there is no politics involved with these dumps, the only goal is to ensure that current Twitter members can now assume that free speech is again alive and well, on the Twitter platform.  In other words, The first Amendment of the Constitution is now again respected.

You can leave your comments also on this Blog, which has never censored anybody.  While this blog is not a political blog but a Social one, hints of political leaning comments have survived on this blog.  I too respect the First Amendment of the Constitution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALEkfJV18uQ 

 

 

THERE IS LITTLE TO ADD TO THE ARTICLE BY Jeff Landry | Fox News

 OPINION BY:  Jeff Landry | Fox News

"I deposed Dr. Fauci for seven hours. Here's what I learned about 'science'"

"Censorship of voices in the name of pseudoscience should never happen again"

"Which came first, the chicken or the egg? One potential answer is that the chicken was first, and the egg was in it. So it is with our current dilemma: which came first, the corruption of science or the censoring of speech? 

It appears they’ve walked hand-in-hand for quite some time, becoming all the more apparent with the consolidation of social media power and the collective efforts of federal bureaucrats who wish to control not only what you think but especially what you say. During no time in human history was this more obvious than during the COVID-19 crisis where social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative.

Throughout the pandemic, doctors, scientists, patients, and families were censored, shadow-banned, blocked, and punished for having views, opinions, and research findings disfavored by the government and their chosen gatekeepers. Hard fast truths that have become indisputable over time, ranging from the effectiveness of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to the potential dangers of Remdesivir and the failures of the vaccine were labeled as "disinformation" and "misinformation."

This was done in direct collusion with social media companies, allowing the federal government and its senior officials to effectively silence legitimate debate in the modern public square. And just as George Washington warned in 1783, "dumb and silent" many of us were "led, like sheep, to the slaughter." Still the government’s message remained clear: trust the science and believe Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

However, science is not belief; a scientist is not supposed to believe anything. It is the role of the scientist to question, debate, refute, and demonstrate with evidence - not blindly accept ideas based on a set of beliefs. Yet over time, classical, evidence-based science has been usurped by hyper-monetized and hyper-propagandized institutions still hiding behind the mask of what it used to be.  

For example, Fauci, who believes he represents science itself, has a long history of silencing dissent, neutralizing debate, and destroying the career of any scientist who disagrees with him by ensuring their research is never funded, published, or taken seriously. Many a scientist over the past fifty years has been vilified, ridiculed, and sacrificed at this altar of Fauci-ism and the profits that come with it. As a result, he has never been forced to debate or prove anything over his 54 years with the NIH. Yet he argues in the documentary FAUCI, "I’m the bad guy to an entire subset of people because I represent something that is uncomfortable to them. It's called the truth."  

In that same film, Susan Rice waxed poetic about Fauci’s "fact-based, evidence-based leadership" while Bill Gates called him "a rockstar" for the truth. Indeed, the man who has graced everything from prayer candles to the covers of InStyle and People magazine has been touted as a symbol of consistency, integrity, and truth. And in collusion with social media, he became the curator of supposedly scientifically-based, evidence-based speech. Anything that did not meet that uniquely Fauci standard, whether on Facebook, Twitter, or even Pinterest, had to be destroyed faster than SARS-CoV-2 itself.

So, over our seven-hour deposition, what did Fauci have to say about the "science" he supposedly represents? What evidence did he have to support his unquestionable beliefs, from aggressive mask mandates to lockdowns? Why did he attempt to hide his work with Dr. Peter Daszak on gain-of-function research and attempt to kill the highly likely lab-leak theory? 

And if the mRNA vaccines his NIH actively developed over the past decade are so effective, why did the multi-jabbed Fauci glare at the court reporter who happened to sneeze, then have her wear a mask because he "didn’t want to catch COVID?" Instead of providing us with answers, this supposed beacon of truth said "I don’t recall" 174 times, all while evading questions, trying to run out the clock, and insisting he’s a very busy man (with his signature condescension).

But the fact is, Fauci was never too busy to have Mark Zuckerberg and others actively censor those who did know, who were right, and who might have saved lives during this recent pandemic. Of course, Fauci insists another one is right around the corner; but thanks to this lawsuit, such censorship of voices in the name of pseudoscience should never happen again.

That is our goal moving forward - to ensure that your First Amendment rights are not only protected but also enforced. Hopefully then real science can return to its rightful place in our society as an evidence-based pursuit of Truth, because anything less is simply Newspeak."

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/deposed-anthony-fauci-seven-hours-heres-learned-about-science 

 "Jeff Landry is attorney general of Louisiana and immediate past Chairman of the Republican Attorneys General Association."

Note: Personally, I do not care from where the truth comes from.