With the exception of a few countries, namely the US, UK, (weapons suppliers to Israel) and perhaps very few others who support Israel before the International Court of Justice, the vast majority stands behind Palestine, and its struggle for 'Self-Determination'.
Indonesia's oral presentation at the international court of justice echoes the opinions of the overwhelming majority of countries addressing the 'ICJ' in support of the Palestinian’s case before this court. It was well presented, in my opinion. As luck would have it, Dr. John Day left a comment on another post, indicating he was also impressed.
Video Start: 1:59:00 to 2:20:46
"What is the land-for-peace principle?"
"At the center of the land-for-peace principle is the idea that, should Israel withdraw from the territory it occupies, peace will be made by the surrounding Arab countries in return."
History shows that, evidently, Israel never intended to follow through on this principle, apparently, slow and deliberate de-facto annexation was and still is Israel's plan.
"Support for a two-state solution is also low among Palestinians. Though Palestinian support for a two-state solution reached a peak of 59% in 2012, it has since fallen dramatically."
Thank you for sharing this blog with friends and family. You are helping to overcome the deafening silence from the commercial media on most topics, they just don't want us to know about.
This blog is not monetized, it is strictly produced as a public service.
Thanks Frank... Land at Peace.
ReplyDelete;-)
"The “land-for-peace” principle grew out of a set of U.N. resolutions from the mid-20th century, and it asserts that, if Israel withdraws from the territory it occupies, the surrounding Arab countries will recognize Israel as a sovereign nation, leading to peace in the region.3 days ago"
Delete"What is the land-for-peace principle some hope will resolve ..."
Chicago Council on Global Affairs
https://globalaffairs.org › bluemarble › what-land-peace-..."