I just came across "The Juice Media", and while they discuss some serious stuff, it is done with a sense of humor, and the use of 4 letter words; all in good fun I am sure. However, I do apologize for the language, but the humor won out. I read once in one of the many books by Sigmund Freud that humor is the best way to tell the truth. A word of caution is in order, if some of these Australian schemes have a ring of familiarity to them, it is because they may be very similar, as far as our politics is concerned. The end result is always the same, the common people, us, get always shafted; maybe we should work for a rule change, by about 180 degrees.
https://thejuicemedia.com/honest-government-ad-julian-assange-american-empire/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwQkQxvWilk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ippYOXR65sQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjU8R8oj328
https://thejuicemedia.com/honest-government-ad-julian-assange-american-empire/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yzeOqV7eKI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2ymjCqaAsY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSAEWVy4HYc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW-OMR-iWOE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuQZ6rALub8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNUxQ-9AZss
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Monday, April 15, 2019
Use Alexa At Your Own Risk…She Will Not Keep A Secret
And, there I thought Alexa was my friend, turns out that Alexa is anything but. An investigative report by ‘Deutsche Welle’, a German news outlet, describes the darker side of Alexa. It probably also applies to other similar applications, like Windows 10 'Cortana', for example.
Martin Muno’s report describes the use or misuses of this AI, called Alexa. He writes, in part, the following.
“It's no surprise that Amazon is using Alexa to listen to people's conversations. That's just one more signal that we are moving into an era in which our privacy is no longer protected, DW's Martin Muno writes.
If you ask Amazon's voice-activated virtual assistant, Alexa, whether it is spying on you, the device will reply that it is not and add that your data privacy is very important to it. But then, last week, we learned the truth: Amazon has its employees listen to and transcribe thousands of Alexa conversations each day — without users knowing. According to Amazon, this helps improve the customer experience.”
For his full report follow the link shown.
https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-amazons-alexa-lies-to-and-spies-on-consumers/a-48311738
The old adage of nothing is for free holds again; in the excitement to get something for free we let our guard down, and use these fantastic new features without reservation. During WW II, Hitler’s propaganda was “Pst Feind Hört Mit!” (Psst! enemy listens too), this might be a good warning in our time as well. Just because we are told that our lives will be improved by using this or the other App, or software ‘improvement’, it does not mean it is without risk of privacy invasion.
From my perspective, Alexa and I will be parting our ways; I will research on how to evict her from my life because I can no longer trust her to keep our secrets. My Amazon Fire Tablet allows me to turn off 'Alexa' in 'Settings', which I did, however, I could not uninstall this function.
Windows 10 has a built-in 'Cortana', which cannot be removed, however, one can disable many aspects of her, under 'Settings', which I did. In addition, I always have a tape over the camera eye anyway, from the very beginning.
I am not entirely convinced that my privacy has been restored by my actions, at least I did whatever I could, preventing overt intrusion.
Friday, April 12, 2019
The EU And Whistleblower Protection
The time has come for Whistleblower protection, and the European Union is leading the way with their new Directive.
"What the Commission said:
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-protects-whistleblowers-with-new-directive/a-47865249
The EU have launched a platform onto which violations will be posted after verification.
MEPs launch “EULeaks”, a platform for whistleblowers within the EU
"Any EU staff member or employee who may want to leak something must do so to EULeaks via a secure Tor browser. Lambert explained that all leaks will be screened, read, and analyzed for value before being posted publically. All submitters will remain anonymous."
https://www.dw.com/en/meps-launch-euleaks-a-platform-for-whistleblowers-within-the-eu/a-35903522
The US has some limited form of Whistleblower protection, however, it applies only to federal employees. Unlike the US, the EU included the private sector, as shown above.
"The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 was enacted to protect federal employees who disclose "Government illegality, waste, and corruption" from adverse consequences related to their employment. This act provides protection to whistleblowers that may receive demotions, pay cuts, or a replacement employee."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_protection_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Whistleblowing.pdf
Manning being in the military at the time, was in essence a Government employee when he leaked the video, which clearly documented a war crime that was improperly identified as an action in accordance with the rules of engagements, so the military brass claimed. As one can see, this was murder of the first degree, a war crime and nothing less.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0&feature=youtu.be
Seeing this kind of cowardly action by his comrades, it appears, he decided to expose this crime, as well as other misconducts. For this he was sent to jail, instead of the guilty.
WikiLeaks' Assange, being a publisher, did what other publishers do as a routine, and published the leaked materials. For this he is in trouble with the law because one cannot expose major wrongdoing and get away with it, it is that simple. The majority of the brainwashed public found nothing wrong with the actions depicted in the video, as well as others, it appears. God, save America!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
Does anyone believe that reporting these cold-blooded murders, to the brass, would have been dealt with and exposed to the light of day, when they considered these murders as conduct in accordance with the rules of engagement? Think again.
"What the Commission said:
- All companies with more than 50 staff or an annual turnover of more than €10 million ($12.2 million) must set up an internal procedure to handle whistleblowers' reports.
- State, local and regional adminstrations and councils with more than 10,000 people will also have to comply.
- A three-tier reporting system ensuring confidentiality, consisting of internal reporting channels, a way to report to authorities and/or the public or media.
- Authorities and companies are to be obliged to give feedback.
- All forms of retaliation are to be banned. In case of a breach, whistleblowers should have access to free advice and "adequate remedies." These could include measures to prevent harassment in general as well as dismissals.
- The burden of proof is to be reversed — the organization must prove that they are not acting "in retaliation against the whistleblower.""
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-protects-whistleblowers-with-new-directive/a-47865249
The EU have launched a platform onto which violations will be posted after verification.
MEPs launch “EULeaks”, a platform for whistleblowers within the EU
"Any EU staff member or employee who may want to leak something must do so to EULeaks via a secure Tor browser. Lambert explained that all leaks will be screened, read, and analyzed for value before being posted publically. All submitters will remain anonymous."
https://www.dw.com/en/meps-launch-euleaks-a-platform-for-whistleblowers-within-the-eu/a-35903522
The US has some limited form of Whistleblower protection, however, it applies only to federal employees. Unlike the US, the EU included the private sector, as shown above.
"The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 was enacted to protect federal employees who disclose "Government illegality, waste, and corruption" from adverse consequences related to their employment. This act provides protection to whistleblowers that may receive demotions, pay cuts, or a replacement employee."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_protection_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Whistleblowing.pdf
Manning being in the military at the time, was in essence a Government employee when he leaked the video, which clearly documented a war crime that was improperly identified as an action in accordance with the rules of engagements, so the military brass claimed. As one can see, this was murder of the first degree, a war crime and nothing less.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0&feature=youtu.be
Seeing this kind of cowardly action by his comrades, it appears, he decided to expose this crime, as well as other misconducts. For this he was sent to jail, instead of the guilty.
WikiLeaks' Assange, being a publisher, did what other publishers do as a routine, and published the leaked materials. For this he is in trouble with the law because one cannot expose major wrongdoing and get away with it, it is that simple. The majority of the brainwashed public found nothing wrong with the actions depicted in the video, as well as others, it appears. God, save America!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
Does anyone believe that reporting these cold-blooded murders, to the brass, would have been dealt with and exposed to the light of day, when they considered these murders as conduct in accordance with the rules of engagement? Think again.
Tuesday, April 9, 2019
Napoleonic Code...De Facto Presumption Of Guilt
Let us first become familiar with the idea behind the Napoleonic Code, as it applied to the Courts, during his time. It survives in a number of countries, apparently, also in the US Court of Public Opinion.
"It was drafted by a commission of four eminent jurists and entered into force on 21 March 1804.[2] The Code, with its stress on clearly written and accessible law, was a major step in replacing the previous patchwork of feudal laws. Historian Robert Holtman regards it as one of the few documents that have influenced the whole world.[2]
The Napoleonic Code was not the first legal code to be established in a European country with a civil legal system; it was preceded by the Codex Maximilianeus bavaricus civilis (Bavaria, 1756), the Allgemeines Landrecht (Prussia, 1794), and the West Galician Code (Galicia, then part of Austria, 1797). It was, however, the first modern legal code to be adopted with a pan-European scope, and it strongly influenced the law of many of the countries formed during and after the Napoleonic Wars.[2] The Napoleonic Code influenced developing countries outside Europe, especially in the Middle East, attempting to modernize their countries through legal reforms."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Cod
The big problem with the Napoleonic Code was with the remanding (jailing) of the accused, until proven innocent, hence, the de-facto presumption of guilt.
"The possibility of lengthy remand periods was one reason why the Napoleonic Code was criticized for its de facto presumption of guilt, particularly in common law countries."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Code#Criminal_code
Movements like the #me too#, and similar others all operate on the de-facto presumption of guilt. Up to now it has involved mostly men, who are accused of wrongdoing many, many years ago, and the accusers lived with their perceived distress until the alleged perpetrator seeks high office. Suddenly the historical act becomes so overwhelming that the suppressed hurt must be broadcast in the media, as a warning. These people, apparently, now decided to warn the nation about this bad actor/character. They are not doing this to take revenge, to destroy the person's life, or to become short-term celebrities, they are doing this for the good of the country, one must assume, what else could the reason be?
The US and many other countries operate under the Common Law system, where the presumption is innocence, until proven guilty, and not guilty until proven innocent. So why is the media so willing to publish alleged wrong doing? They all compete now with the Tabloids, it appears; these kinds of stories are good for business, and who cares about these individuals whose reputations go down the toilette in the process?
Some alleged accusations appear to be very serious, and one has to wonder, why wait so many years silently? If true, the perpetrator should have been reported to the police, via a formal complaint. Others are so minor, or bordering on comical that it actually makes sense that these never saw the light of day, until it could really inflict damage to the alleged bad actor. The problem appears to be that all of them involve persons of importance, or imminent importance, like running for high office, for example.
One should be against all forms of harassment, and the judge will always be the perception of the victim, however, when the accuser sits on it, waiting for the right time to go public to the media, then one has the right to be skeptical. One hears or reads, at times, that during divorce proceedings spouses accuse each other with made up stories for revenge, or just to gain a legal advantage. Revenge is a powerful urge to overcome.
"It was drafted by a commission of four eminent jurists and entered into force on 21 March 1804.[2] The Code, with its stress on clearly written and accessible law, was a major step in replacing the previous patchwork of feudal laws. Historian Robert Holtman regards it as one of the few documents that have influenced the whole world.[2]
The Napoleonic Code was not the first legal code to be established in a European country with a civil legal system; it was preceded by the Codex Maximilianeus bavaricus civilis (Bavaria, 1756), the Allgemeines Landrecht (Prussia, 1794), and the West Galician Code (Galicia, then part of Austria, 1797). It was, however, the first modern legal code to be adopted with a pan-European scope, and it strongly influenced the law of many of the countries formed during and after the Napoleonic Wars.[2] The Napoleonic Code influenced developing countries outside Europe, especially in the Middle East, attempting to modernize their countries through legal reforms."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Cod
The big problem with the Napoleonic Code was with the remanding (jailing) of the accused, until proven innocent, hence, the de-facto presumption of guilt.
"The possibility of lengthy remand periods was one reason why the Napoleonic Code was criticized for its de facto presumption of guilt, particularly in common law countries."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Code#Criminal_code
Movements like the #me too#, and similar others all operate on the de-facto presumption of guilt. Up to now it has involved mostly men, who are accused of wrongdoing many, many years ago, and the accusers lived with their perceived distress until the alleged perpetrator seeks high office. Suddenly the historical act becomes so overwhelming that the suppressed hurt must be broadcast in the media, as a warning. These people, apparently, now decided to warn the nation about this bad actor/character. They are not doing this to take revenge, to destroy the person's life, or to become short-term celebrities, they are doing this for the good of the country, one must assume, what else could the reason be?
The US and many other countries operate under the Common Law system, where the presumption is innocence, until proven guilty, and not guilty until proven innocent. So why is the media so willing to publish alleged wrong doing? They all compete now with the Tabloids, it appears; these kinds of stories are good for business, and who cares about these individuals whose reputations go down the toilette in the process?
Some alleged accusations appear to be very serious, and one has to wonder, why wait so many years silently? If true, the perpetrator should have been reported to the police, via a formal complaint. Others are so minor, or bordering on comical that it actually makes sense that these never saw the light of day, until it could really inflict damage to the alleged bad actor. The problem appears to be that all of them involve persons of importance, or imminent importance, like running for high office, for example.
One should be against all forms of harassment, and the judge will always be the perception of the victim, however, when the accuser sits on it, waiting for the right time to go public to the media, then one has the right to be skeptical. One hears or reads, at times, that during divorce proceedings spouses accuse each other with made up stories for revenge, or just to gain a legal advantage. Revenge is a powerful urge to overcome.
I found this quote about revenge.
"Generally you won't make your life better by
hurting another person. The only time that your life improves when
another is hurt is when your life isn't worth much to begin with. To take Revenge normally requires that you lower yourself to their level. Its not worth it unless you are already there."
https://www.quora.com/Is-revenge-really-worth-it Monday, April 1, 2019
Stop Playing With The Cloak! By Howard Olson
My good friend Howard sent me the following sample letter he sent to his Senators and Member of Congress for his district. States like Arizona and Hawaii have it right, they don't fool around with their clock; for them Standard Time is the time year round. Having lived in Hawaii for a number of years, I fully concur with his argument.
I am a native Floridian, and last year our state made an effort in the right direction, only to be undermined by Congress. Moving our clocks backward and forward an hour doesn’t sound like a big deal, but there seems to be considerable statistical evidence that this takes a human toll in increased accidents, crime, illness and even death. Every spring and every fall we are forced to endure the unnatural shift in our biological clocks since most of the USA adopted this enormously bad idea. It is finally time for Congress to take responsibility for a vote to correct this error. We can live with either outcome. We can stay on DST or keep standard time. Either choice is superior to this ridiculous semi-annual ritual.
This issue, clearly not a world problem, is at the top of my list and shouldn’t be that hard to fix. Most people who discuss this agree with me. I think most voters will celebrate a refreshing feeling of unity upon correcting this. Can we please find a majority in both houses and support from the administration to resolve this problem within the next few months? It is my hope that we don’t have to adjust our clocks again in the fall. My vote and my political donations/contributions will depend on it. Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Howard Olsen"
I will campaign for standard time to include Arizona, Hawaii, and all the other US places that operate also on this time standard.
Ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_in_the_United_States
Apart from being a nuisance there are some real health and safety concerns connected with it.
https://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst/daylight-saving-health.html
This nonsense started as follows.
"The Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S. Code Section 260a) [see law], signed into Public Law 89-387 on April 12, 1966, by President Lyndon Johnson, created Daylight Saving Time to begin on the last Sunday of April and to end on the last Sunday of October."
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=start+of+daylight+savings+time
To find the name, etc. of your member of Congress follow this link below, however, you may have to use your phone book to get their email address, or fax number.
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_current_members_of_the_U.S._Congress
Yes, please pass it on our health depends on it.
http://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/
By Howard Olsen
"Let's unite the nation on an issue that affects us all.I am a native Floridian, and last year our state made an effort in the right direction, only to be undermined by Congress. Moving our clocks backward and forward an hour doesn’t sound like a big deal, but there seems to be considerable statistical evidence that this takes a human toll in increased accidents, crime, illness and even death. Every spring and every fall we are forced to endure the unnatural shift in our biological clocks since most of the USA adopted this enormously bad idea. It is finally time for Congress to take responsibility for a vote to correct this error. We can live with either outcome. We can stay on DST or keep standard time. Either choice is superior to this ridiculous semi-annual ritual.
This issue, clearly not a world problem, is at the top of my list and shouldn’t be that hard to fix. Most people who discuss this agree with me. I think most voters will celebrate a refreshing feeling of unity upon correcting this. Can we please find a majority in both houses and support from the administration to resolve this problem within the next few months? It is my hope that we don’t have to adjust our clocks again in the fall. My vote and my political donations/contributions will depend on it. Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Howard Olsen"
I will campaign for standard time to include Arizona, Hawaii, and all the other US places that operate also on this time standard.
Ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_in_the_United_States
Apart from being a nuisance there are some real health and safety concerns connected with it.
https://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst/daylight-saving-health.html
This nonsense started as follows.
"The Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S. Code Section 260a) [see law], signed into Public Law 89-387 on April 12, 1966, by President Lyndon Johnson, created Daylight Saving Time to begin on the last Sunday of April and to end on the last Sunday of October."
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=start+of+daylight+savings+time
To find the name, etc. of your member of Congress follow this link below, however, you may have to use your phone book to get their email address, or fax number.
https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_current_members_of_the_U.S._Congress
Yes, please pass it on our health depends on it.
http://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Happy Anniversary or is it?
Who gives these shooting orders to maim and kill unarmed civilians? Who is the top Zionist? What crime is this, approaching a fence/wall without a weapon? The Israeli military claims otherwise. It should be clear to a reasonable person that this is an unequal contest at best. The SS would have been proud of the Israeli military action against the 'live threatening' protesters. The only justification, for these shootings, would be that the Israeli soldiers, behind their well protected positions, were afraid for their lives. This then would confirm their cowardliness. As it is, the Zionists, who give these orders to maim and kill, are committing crimes against humanity, it appears.
Ref. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/gaza-great-march-return-thousands-rally-anniversary-190330103843689.html
The next link points to the statistics of the carnage during last year's demonstration. How would we feel if somebody illegally would confiscate our home and our land, and kick us out to add insult to injury?
Ref. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/hamas-israel-agreement-reducing-gaza-tensions-report-190330054508118.html
One would think that a people who suffered under the Third Reich, as we are reminded of constantly, would not resort to SS tactics, like killing innocent men, women and children, whose only desire is to return to their lands and homes, which were forcefully and illegally expropriated. Under international law a victor has no right to steal any of the lands of the vanquished, to the contrary, the victor is now responsible for the defeated population. When the allied forces entered Germany they did not steal any of the German lands, not a square foot of it.
As discussed in an earlier blog post, the Old Testament, in the Bible, is full of stories when the Jewish people slaughtered men, women, children and beasts in order to take the land of others. Their justification was always God ordered them to do it. A very convenient justification; is God still telling them the same thing regarding the Palestinians? One can argue with this, considering the Ten Commandments, shown below.
Why would God say, under the 6th Commandment, "Thou shall not kill" and then violate his own Commandments by saying, for example, under Jeremiah 50:21 "Against the land of Merathaim, go up against it, And against the inhabitants of Pekod. Slay and utterly destroy them," declares the LORD, "And do according to all that I have commanded you."? It just does not make sense. It appears that whoever wrote about these killings of others, used God as a pretext for violations of the 6th Commandment, i.e these statements, attributed to God, were nothing but self-serving.
Ref. http://www.smartbiblesearch.com/search_results2.php?set=AYYYDI&lv=nasb&v=ABCDEFGH&p=1&&s=kill%20them%20all&r=18003&rw=&qi=&i=&j=Y&t=&rng=&l=.JzI3RiA4IEEgTic0PCAzNSBBIFknMTNZIDUwIFIgWQ%E%E&e=Y
Why have international laws when none of the nations is willing to enforce them? Writing and passing a number of UN resolutions does nothing for the people in Gaza and the Palestinians as a whole. The Zionists thumb their noses about these resolutions, for them these are meaningless, and the world de facto agrees by doing nothing.
It appears, the cruelty dished out in the occupied territories serves two goals, humiliate both the Christian minority and the Muslim majority, and while so doing continue to steal their lands, under the closed eyes of the world. Myself, I respect the rights of the Jewish people to exist and to live freely, but I also respect the same rights for all Palestinians, who currently live under a gruel occupation.
Yes, by all means pass it on, and make others also think about this humanitarian problem. Don't expect our politicians to ponder about this issue, too many take the money of the perpetrators. Politicians have their finger on our pulse, and if we do not have any signs of a racing pulse, caused by an issue, they will let the sleeping dog lie, so to speak.
Monday, March 25, 2019
Is A Two Party System An Equal Opportunity For Rich Classes?
There is no doubt, the rich in the US were not all produced by using the same cookie-cutter. Each class of the rich leaning towards the left has a counterpart leaning towards the right. Each of these two political alliances employ their political candidates, whom they well know have a great need for money, to fill their political war-chests. This then represents a symbiotic relationship kept alive by the self-preservation drive of each involved. Each member of these alliances performs its obligations to achieve the expected return from the other; it is a perpetual cycle.
Now, one might ask where is all that money coming from that flows bidirectional? The answer is very simple, the rich extract wealth from consumers by making as big a profit as legally possible for their investments, goods/and or services, while the politicians pave the way to make such outrageous net earnings possible, and legal.
The two party political system makes sure that no faction has their hand in the cookie jar indefinitely, and this is where we, the consumer, come into play. Every four years we are given the opportunity to choose from which symbiotic alliance we want to be taken advantage of. If that is not democracy in action, what is?
Under the Reagan years we heard a lot about trickle-down economics by his critics, who did not understand entirely that this is the way it works. In order to get elected, politicians spend the money (political contributions) received from their benefactors, for advertising, and by promising, during political rallies, the crumbs the voters will get when in office. It is a very frugal way to spend money because most promises are not kept anyway. When one watches gluttons at dinner table, there are times when crumbs hit the floor, and this is the time for the peasants to get their dinner. This is the classical definition of trickle-down economics. Get it?
It almost appears, our votes kind of legalize this unjust wealth extraction, at our expense. On the good-side, during each election cycle we are entertained with political drama and accusation flying back and forth, keeping us occupied, and thus preventing us observing the sleight of the political hand at work. To fully understand this issue better, let us look at two historical charts, which are self-explanatory. The moral of the story is, "The rich get richer and the poor get..."
https://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation/Cumulative_Inflation_by_Decade.asp
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2018/10/16/u-s-household-incomes-a-51-year-perspective
Again, pass it on, start a conversation with people you know and care about. We need to spend less time watching what is fed to use via the media, and engage more in a dialog with people around us. Politicians depend on us being dumb fat and happy; let us show them that we are not, by voicing our concerns.
Saturday, March 16, 2019
To Eat, Or Not To Eat Is The Question For Many Of Us
We, in the US, are the most abused people when it comes to the life saving drugs like Insulin many of us depend on to stay alive. People without insurance pay on average $1,000 per month, needless to say, some pay much more; it is really a form of gross extortion.
Refer to the BBC article, the link to which is shown below.
"In 1923, the discoverers of insulin sold its patent for $1, hoping the low price would keep the essential treatment available to everyone who needed it.
Now, retail prices in the US are around the $300 range for all insulins from the three major brands that control the market.
Even accounting for inflation, that's a price increase of over 1,000%.
Stories of Americans rationing insulin - and dying for it - have been making national headlines."
It may have made the news once, and then was dropped like a hot potato. I, a news junkie, do not recall ever hearing of it. Moreover, I am under the impression the BBC reports News, and not stories from the archives of other media outlets, hence, they just discovered these facts as well; that is my assumption. When people have to forego essential nutrition in order to afford their lifesaving drugs, or take less of the required dosage, so that they can eat, it is alarming by any standard.
Do you remember when being a Millionaire was a big deal, now you have to be a Billionaire to get attention, so it seems? Everything appears to increase, for the wealthy, by a factor of 1000, except the average working stiff is mostly flat-lined, as far as wages are concerned, when considering inflation. Is this a just society? I think not. Where is this exaggerated wealth coming from? It comes from unjust wealth extraction from the rest of; criminally inflated drug prices is just one example.
The following chart, shown below, makes this very point.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47491964
When the US is compared to other countries on topics like education, and healthcare for all, etc., we don't look so good. However, when one compares the costs for healthcare, we certainly are on the top of the list, as he most expensive. We, in the US, are legends in our own mind when we exclaim that we are the best/the greatest country in the world; whom are we kidding? Our Government and the businesses who donate large sums of money for their election war-chests, in return for letting them bleed the public to dead, are nothing but antisocial characters, more like sociopaths who probably never miss a Sunday in church. Hypocrites, one can add to the list, that is all they are.
Where is the Press in all of this ongoing, drug related health crisis? They think by slamming the President daily, they are doing their job. It appears, their job is to keep us occupied with their tabloid stories, so that we have no time to pay attention to the real needs of people around us. After all, these national news media outlets are owned by a few, who are part of the social problem, and their employees better write their stories not to piss-off the boss.
Some doctors are no help either, a case in point is a personal experience my wife had, just a short while ago; she needed eye drops to lower the eye pressure. The Ophthalmologist prescribed a proprietary drug that even with insurance was still over $30 per month; they tried to convince her that there were no other choices. When I did a little research I found that the generic drug Latanoprost was not only less expensive but was more easily taken by patients, which my wife confirmed. Now instead of $30 per month she spends only $5 for three months supply.
Let us not just shake our heads, and forget about it, let us start a conversation with others, and if enough people care, maybe we can make some noise that those politicians cannot afford to ignore, especially during election time.
Pass this, and other stories like it, to people you care about, to get the conversation started.
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Always Err On The Side Of Caution
Yes, when in doubt one should always try to err on the side of caution. Major countries all over the world decided to do just that, and grounded the Boeing 737 MAX, but the US FAA prefers to err on the side of risk, by still permitting this plane to be in the sky. This presents a risk not only to the passengers and crew onboard, but also to civilians on the ground, should a plane crash into a populated area. We had two crashes of this type of aircraft killing many people, the last two months, but the FAA and airlines operating this type of plane are willing to risk the lives of their customers, and possibly other on the ground. Why? Surely these gamblers will not fly any of these planes; actually, we should force them to fly these birds, to show their confidence in their decision.
Apparently, Boeing is tinkering with an anti-stall algorithm for this plane, and from what I have experienced with other, so called, software improvements, they seldom are. Perhaps, instead of preventing a stall, it may be causing a stall.
Ref. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-47536502
We, as a country, clearly show that human life takes second place after the dollar. Shame on us!
Apparently, Boeing is tinkering with an anti-stall algorithm for this plane, and from what I have experienced with other, so called, software improvements, they seldom are. Perhaps, instead of preventing a stall, it may be causing a stall.
Ref. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-47536502
We, as a country, clearly show that human life takes second place after the dollar. Shame on us!
Saturday, March 9, 2019
Well, This Is Very Embarrasing, To Say the Least
First, thank you Dr. John for bringing this story to my attention.
It appears, some well-known 'Russian Pranksters' organized a conference call with Elliot Abrams, US special envoy for Venezuela, a man with a long history and experience with trying to topple foreign Governments, not always successful, one might add.
The following quotes were taken from https://sputniknews.com/latam/201903061073002069-abrams-full-interview-audio/
"Vovan and Lexus, Russian telephone pranksters known for their trolling of politicians from around the world, have struck again, targeting US special representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams to find out more about the US-backed effort to unseat that country's legitimate government. Sputnik got ahold of the full audio from the talks."
"Posing as Swiss President Ueli Maurer, who also serves as the country's finance minister, the pranksters contacted Abrams on two occasions – in mid-February and early March, speaking to him for over 23 minutes about Swiss policy on the ongoing effort to freeze the Venezuelan government's assets as part of broader plans to replace President Nicolas Maduro with US-backed opposition leader Juan Guaido."
When following the above link you will get a good deal of background information, enabling you to better understand the recorded telephone call; needless to say, there probably will be denial that this phone call ever happened. Please follow the link, to the recording, below.
https://soundcloud.com/radiosputnik/russian-pranksters-call-us-special-representative-for-venezuela-elliot-abrams
The moral of the story is, being a country with super large oil deposits is not always a good thing.
It is perplexing that a major country, which professes to spread democracy around the world, is actually bent on destroying a Government that just recently was elected by its people? One could infer that free elections are the sign of a democratic society, exercising their free will. What else could it be? The fact that Mr. Juan Guaido is still alive confirms that Nicolas Maduro is not a dictator, were it not so Guaido would be in prison, or in an unmarked grave.
What is not surprising is that highly paid and influential people are stupid enough to fall for pranks like this one, and others, again and again. It just shows that we are governed by not necessarily intelligent people, just by people whose ego, greed and lust for power places them into high positions that normal intelligent, and honest individuals would not want to occupy, at any price.
Trump said it best during a 'hot mic.' incident: when you rich you get away with anything.
It appears, some well-known 'Russian Pranksters' organized a conference call with Elliot Abrams, US special envoy for Venezuela, a man with a long history and experience with trying to topple foreign Governments, not always successful, one might add.
The following quotes were taken from https://sputniknews.com/latam/201903061073002069-abrams-full-interview-audio/
"Vovan and Lexus, Russian telephone pranksters known for their trolling of politicians from around the world, have struck again, targeting US special representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams to find out more about the US-backed effort to unseat that country's legitimate government. Sputnik got ahold of the full audio from the talks."
"Posing as Swiss President Ueli Maurer, who also serves as the country's finance minister, the pranksters contacted Abrams on two occasions – in mid-February and early March, speaking to him for over 23 minutes about Swiss policy on the ongoing effort to freeze the Venezuelan government's assets as part of broader plans to replace President Nicolas Maduro with US-backed opposition leader Juan Guaido."
When following the above link you will get a good deal of background information, enabling you to better understand the recorded telephone call; needless to say, there probably will be denial that this phone call ever happened. Please follow the link, to the recording, below.
https://soundcloud.com/radiosputnik/russian-pranksters-call-us-special-representative-for-venezuela-elliot-abrams
The moral of the story is, being a country with super large oil deposits is not always a good thing.
It is perplexing that a major country, which professes to spread democracy around the world, is actually bent on destroying a Government that just recently was elected by its people? One could infer that free elections are the sign of a democratic society, exercising their free will. What else could it be? The fact that Mr. Juan Guaido is still alive confirms that Nicolas Maduro is not a dictator, were it not so Guaido would be in prison, or in an unmarked grave.
What is not surprising is that highly paid and influential people are stupid enough to fall for pranks like this one, and others, again and again. It just shows that we are governed by not necessarily intelligent people, just by people whose ego, greed and lust for power places them into high positions that normal intelligent, and honest individuals would not want to occupy, at any price.
Trump said it best during a 'hot mic.' incident: when you rich you get away with anything.
Saturday, February 23, 2019
How Can One Violate An Illegal/Unconstitutional Law?
The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution affords us the right to privacy and protection against unlawful searches.
The Fourth Amendment says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The Courts have long held that this amendment includes the right to privacy. See ACLU v. Clapper below.
In this following video Esward Snowden explains his reasons for speaking out,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loLSdh26V5I
It appears to me that the only reason why Edward Snowden is in trouble with the Government is that it does not respect our Constitution, if it were not so, this illegal collection of our data would have never been carried out, at great monetary expense to all taxpayers, who paid for the elaborate, expensive NSA installations.
We are told that the Government has no money to help the poor, provide free coverage for healthcare, and education, etc. but, apparently, we have plenty of taxpayer monies to spy on citizens, and send them to their death in very, very costly wars in foreign lands. Moreover, our politicians generally agree that our infrastructure is crumbling and is outdated but none direct their attention to this problem either. Their attention is on overturning foreign Governments, like Venezuela at present, by supplying goods of all kinds, to support these power plays. They do not see the many needs right at home in our country, where people live on the streets, hungry, cold, and sick.
The Fourth Amendment says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The Courts have long held that this amendment includes the right to privacy. See ACLU v. Clapper below.
Is it not our 'Patriotic Duty' to report wrongdoing no matter who the culprit is? The Second Circuit in ACLU v. Clapper held that the action by the NSA, in reference to their data collection, was illegal. See reference below.
"Another aspect of the Patriot Act, which has been highly confidential
was the Telephone Metadata program, which under § 215 of the Patriot
Act, had allowed the NSA to collect data about Americans’ telephone
calls in bulk, was reviewed by the Second Circuit in ACLU v. Clapper, in which the court held the Telephone Metadata program illegal under the Congress’ original intent under the §215."
Ref. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment
Edward Snowden is charged by the US Government with:
"18 U.STCT 641 Theft of Government Property
18 U.S.C. ?93(d) Unauthorized Communication of National Defense information
18 U.S.C. 798(a)(3) Willful Communication of Classified Communications to an Unauthorized Person."
Ref. https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/us-vs-edward-j-snowden-criminal-complaint/496/
In this following video Esward Snowden explains his reasons for speaking out,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loLSdh26V5I
It appears to me that the only reason why Edward Snowden is in trouble with the Government is that it does not respect our Constitution, if it were not so, this illegal collection of our data would have never been carried out, at great monetary expense to all taxpayers, who paid for the elaborate, expensive NSA installations.
We are told that the Government has no money to help the poor, provide free coverage for healthcare, and education, etc. but, apparently, we have plenty of taxpayer monies to spy on citizens, and send them to their death in very, very costly wars in foreign lands. Moreover, our politicians generally agree that our infrastructure is crumbling and is outdated but none direct their attention to this problem either. Their attention is on overturning foreign Governments, like Venezuela at present, by supplying goods of all kinds, to support these power plays. They do not see the many needs right at home in our country, where people live on the streets, hungry, cold, and sick.
Friday, February 15, 2019
5G Health Warning
Thanks to Dr. John I received the following link to an article that could open your eyes and save you from grieve. I am not an expert in this field, therefore I will not comment on the subject. I know only one thing owning a smart phone is not that smart because it is a tool designed to invade your privacy. Invading our privacy is bad enough but screwing up our health is definitely not acceptable. Apparently, this can affect all of us phone or no phone; it will be in the environment. I think, it may be time to pass this around to all you know, and be part of the effort to stop this nonsense. I am doing my part.
https://truepublica.org.uk/global/what-you-dont-know-about-5g-but-will-find-out-when-its-too-late/
I don't know about you, I am alarmed, and after reading the article, you may be too.
https://truepublica.org.uk/global/what-you-dont-know-about-5g-but-will-find-out-when-its-too-late/
I don't know about you, I am alarmed, and after reading the article, you may be too.
Tuesday, February 12, 2019
The First Amendment Ignored Again And Again By Ignorance Or Design
While I do not necessarily agree with the veiled wording Omar chose to express herself, I for one respect her constitutional right to free speech. I am more for the direct approach, leaving little doubt about my message.
ABS News: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-democratic-leaders-call-omar-apologize-anti-semitic/story?id=60992550
Funny, another Congress Woman called the President of the U.S. a "Mother F***ker", Pelosi had no problems with it, at that time, but hint at criticizing Israel/Jews for any reason, perhaps including the inhuman treatment of the Palestinians, and the whole world is about to blowup. According to many old guard politicians, Omar committed a cardinal sin by showing us, the Peasants, what it means to express our criticism, by speaking freely when criticizing the Jewish state, under the protection of the first amendment. How can the old guard keep on controlling the narrative, when this freshman member of Congress dares to break rank. She had to be whipped into shape to ensure the control of the peasants continues. Too bad Omar did not stand her ground; there was nothing to apologize for, her speech was and is protected, no matter what Pelosi and others think. This is why nothing will ever change in the Congress, fresh voices are at once muzzled, for the common good of the Congress; certainly not for the good of the people.
Antisemitism deals with instances where the right of Semitic people to exist is brought into question, or as the Jewish state likes to think, "The word antisemitism means prejudice against or hatred of Jews" exclusively.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/antisemitism
Just like Holocaust so has Antisemitism been hijacked by the Jewish state, for their exclusive use only, to squelch any criticism by anybody; they no longer are obligated to explain their inhuman actions against other peoples, all the have to do is yell Holocaust or Antisemitism, to end all discussions, and they win.
Semite speakers of East Semitic include the Akkadians and the descended cultures of Assyria and Babylonia. Central Semitic combines Northwest Semitic and Arabic. Speakers of Northwest Semitic were the Canaanites (including the Phoenicians, the Hebrews, and the Aramaeans).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Semitic-speaking_peoples
Under this new and narrow Jewish definition even God would be classified as an antisemite; did he not send the Jews into exile several times and let them wander for 40 years in the desert, denying them to enter the land of the Canaanites? Did not God and the prophets call them a stiff-necked people (Exodus 32:9; 33:3; Deuteronomy 9:6; 2 Chronicles 36:13; Jeremiah 17:23, etc.)?
None of the posts, shown above, by Omar, rose to this level, so why drop another antisemite bomb, just to express displeasure when somebody hints at calling out the Jewish state for their 'Human Rights' violations, perhaps.
The first amendment is simple enough to understand, so what is their problem?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
We have been given the right to speak freely, and none have the right to abridge our speech, not even Pelosi and like-minded individuals. So, why is it that people are forced to apologize for exercising their constitutional right? Are we a constitutional democracy or not? So far, I have found nothing in the Constitution that gives Jews or Israel special privileges or rights that are uniquely for their benefit.
Last year, "Israel's parliament has passed a controversial law characterizing the country as principally a Jewish state, fueling anger among its Arab minority."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44881554
In doing so, this Jewish state has successfully marginalized all of its minority Arab population. If we would like to call out antisemitic states, we must include the Jewish State, which has for the longest time refused to acknowledge the right of the Palestinians to exist as a free Palestinian nation.
I say enough with these false Antisemitic claims, for the sake of making political points, squelch just criticism or prevent fresh voices from being heard.
ABS News: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-democratic-leaders-call-omar-apologize-anti-semitic/story?id=60992550
"Omar apologizes after Democratic leaders criticize her 'anti-Semitic comments'
Both Republicans and Democrats have criticized the Muslim member of Congress." ABS News
Here are the posts by Omar that got many bent out of shape:
"It's all about the Benjamins baby ?? https://t.co/KatcXJnZLV Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) February 10, 2019"
"AIPAC! https://t.co/UdzaFUEfrh
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) February 11, 2019"
Antisemitism deals with instances where the right of Semitic people to exist is brought into question, or as the Jewish state likes to think, "The word antisemitism means prejudice against or hatred of Jews" exclusively.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/antisemitism
Just like Holocaust so has Antisemitism been hijacked by the Jewish state, for their exclusive use only, to squelch any criticism by anybody; they no longer are obligated to explain their inhuman actions against other peoples, all the have to do is yell Holocaust or Antisemitism, to end all discussions, and they win.
Semite speakers of East Semitic include the Akkadians and the descended cultures of Assyria and Babylonia. Central Semitic combines Northwest Semitic and Arabic. Speakers of Northwest Semitic were the Canaanites (including the Phoenicians, the Hebrews, and the Aramaeans).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Semitic-speaking_peoples
Under this new and narrow Jewish definition even God would be classified as an antisemite; did he not send the Jews into exile several times and let them wander for 40 years in the desert, denying them to enter the land of the Canaanites? Did not God and the prophets call them a stiff-necked people (Exodus 32:9; 33:3; Deuteronomy 9:6; 2 Chronicles 36:13; Jeremiah 17:23, etc.)?
None of the posts, shown above, by Omar, rose to this level, so why drop another antisemite bomb, just to express displeasure when somebody hints at calling out the Jewish state for their 'Human Rights' violations, perhaps.
The first amendment is simple enough to understand, so what is their problem?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
We have been given the right to speak freely, and none have the right to abridge our speech, not even Pelosi and like-minded individuals. So, why is it that people are forced to apologize for exercising their constitutional right? Are we a constitutional democracy or not? So far, I have found nothing in the Constitution that gives Jews or Israel special privileges or rights that are uniquely for their benefit.
Last year, "Israel's parliament has passed a controversial law characterizing the country as principally a Jewish state, fueling anger among its Arab minority."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44881554
In doing so, this Jewish state has successfully marginalized all of its minority Arab population. If we would like to call out antisemitic states, we must include the Jewish State, which has for the longest time refused to acknowledge the right of the Palestinians to exist as a free Palestinian nation.
I say enough with these false Antisemitic claims, for the sake of making political points, squelch just criticism or prevent fresh voices from being heard.
Thursday, February 7, 2019
Inactivity May Be The Kiss Of Death
The Guardian article, forwarded to me by Dr. John, referred to below is very much on point because it reminds us of a fact that we all know, namely, exercise is good for us. From my own experience I observed that my pumping (systolic) pressure usually drops 20+ mmHg, after a one-hour walk. Our mostly sedentary lifestyle, associated with office work, and similar, creates a variety of problems, it appears. Doctors have always urged us to exercise, only to end up prescribing some medication for whatever ails us because we refused to listen.
I don't know about you but I will read through the article and incorporate what makes sense, and what I can do, considering my physical capabilities. If you value good health, it is time to do something about it; let us surprise our doctor at our next visit.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/06/exercise-health-move-all-day-standing-desk
We can do this, at least some of it.
Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Is The First Amendment Under Attack?
More than the First Amendment is under attack, our very right to privacy is no longer guaranteed. I was writing my blog posting (not yet published), which included YouTube links associated with 9/11, and while I was finishing my work of several days (a long post), suddenly and without warning all of my work disappeared, and is no longer on the blogger.com server. Just like the Twin Towers my work pulverized, which tells me that the censorship is already active, and my freedom of speech and right to privacy has been violated, in one swoop. This vanished post was not yet published, but was on their server, so it is very clear, their algorithm is now setup to yank anything that could point the finger at the perhaps guilty.
I will try with an email to provide these links to you, for I think it is very important to present both sides of the argument, about 9/11.
I will try with an email to provide these links to you, for I think it is very important to present both sides of the argument, about 9/11.
Friday, January 25, 2019
A Healthy Increase In Reader Visits
Yes, this blog experienced 'A Healthy Increase In Reader Visits', the following statistics show the extent of it.
These number statistics were provided by 'BlogSpot.com', the host of this blog.
up from August 2017
US----------------------------------------5,436, up 30.9%
Russia------------------------------------ 881, " 39.6%
Germany--------------------------------- 569, " 35.1%
Brazil------------------------------------- 210, " 0.0%
Ukraine----------------------------------- 228, " 18.1%
France------------------------------------- 184, " 26.0%
Turkey------------------------------------- 123, " 0.0%
Ireland------------------------------------- 108, " 44.0%
All Others----------------------------------1197, unknown
By the way, if you find a certain post really interesting, why not give the link to your relatives and friends, and recommend for them to read it, and perhaps even comment on it. Speaking of comments, I really like to read your comments; so far you guys have been way too quiet. Most comments I have received were given to me privately by email, and I will always respect your privacy.
Thank you all for being such good readers!
Regards,
Frank
These number statistics were provided by 'BlogSpot.com', the host of this blog.
up from August 2017
US----------------------------------------5,436, up 30.9%
Russia------------------------------------ 881, " 39.6%
Germany--------------------------------- 569, " 35.1%
Brazil------------------------------------- 210, " 0.0%
Ukraine----------------------------------- 228, " 18.1%
France------------------------------------- 184, " 26.0%
Turkey------------------------------------- 123, " 0.0%
Ireland------------------------------------- 108, " 44.0%
All Others----------------------------------1197, unknown
By the way, if you find a certain post really interesting, why not give the link to your relatives and friends, and recommend for them to read it, and perhaps even comment on it. Speaking of comments, I really like to read your comments; so far you guys have been way too quiet. Most comments I have received were given to me privately by email, and I will always respect your privacy.
Thank you all for being such good readers!
Regards,
Frank
Thursday, January 24, 2019
What Exactly Is Anti-Semitism?
This blog post was inspired by The New York Times' article referred to near the end of this post.
Here is an article explaining anti-semitism. "Written By:Michael Berenbaum
Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time. Although the term now has wide currency, it is a misnomer, since it implies a discrimination against all Semites. Arabs and other peoples are also Semites, and yet they are not the targets of anti-Semitism as it is usually understood. The term is especially inappropriate as a label for the anti-Jewish prejudices, statements, or actions of Arabs or other Semites. Nazi anti-Semitism, which culminated in the Holocaust, had a racist dimension in that it targeted Jews because of their supposed biological characteristics—even those who had themselves converted to other religions or whose parents were converts. This variety of anti-Jewish racism dates only to the emergence of so-called “scientific racism” in the 19th century and is different in nature from earlier anti-Jewish prejudices."
His bio can be found at https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Michael-Berenbaum/4530
I disagree with part of above, namely, "Nazi anti-Semitism, which culminated in the Holocaust, had a racist dimension in that it targeted Jews because of their supposed biological characteristics--"
I would have preferred to read ...it targeted Jews, and others because of their ..." As I stated in another blog post, the Holocaust does not belong to the Jews alone; many more millions other than Jews were killed as well.
As shown above, like 'Holocaust' so is 'Antisemitism' misused, both are not the sole property of the Zionists, who throw these terms around to squelch any just criticism of their inhuman actions against the Palestinian people.
Definitions provided by: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Hostility: "deep-seated usually mutual ill will"
Discrimination: "prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment racial discrimination"
It is evident that to be critical of the State of Israel is not a form of discrimination, nor is it antisemitic, as is always claimed by the Zionists. If it were not so, the State of Israel would be, by default, above international laws, laws that they ignore at present anyway with impunity. No wonder that this state thinks and acts as if it is their God given right to add other peoples land to theirs, at will.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zionism
"Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion."
A decription of Palestine can be found at, https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine
Here is an interesting article by Michelle Alexander,
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/martin-luther-king-palestine-israel.html
Now let us take a look at the ancient map, shown below, and a modus operandi becomes evident.
When looking at the map closely, it becomes clear that the Jewish nation has a history of adding other peoples' land to the original Jewish state under Judas, and trying to eventually take all of the land from the Palestinians, settlement by settlement, appears to be nothing more than the same.
Here is an article explaining anti-semitism. "Written By:Michael Berenbaum
Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time. Although the term now has wide currency, it is a misnomer, since it implies a discrimination against all Semites. Arabs and other peoples are also Semites, and yet they are not the targets of anti-Semitism as it is usually understood. The term is especially inappropriate as a label for the anti-Jewish prejudices, statements, or actions of Arabs or other Semites. Nazi anti-Semitism, which culminated in the Holocaust, had a racist dimension in that it targeted Jews because of their supposed biological characteristics—even those who had themselves converted to other religions or whose parents were converts. This variety of anti-Jewish racism dates only to the emergence of so-called “scientific racism” in the 19th century and is different in nature from earlier anti-Jewish prejudices."
His bio can be found at https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Michael-Berenbaum/4530
I disagree with part of above, namely, "Nazi anti-Semitism, which culminated in the Holocaust, had a racist dimension in that it targeted Jews because of their supposed biological characteristics--"
I would have preferred to read ...it targeted Jews, and others because of their ..." As I stated in another blog post, the Holocaust does not belong to the Jews alone; many more millions other than Jews were killed as well.
As shown above, like 'Holocaust' so is 'Antisemitism' misused, both are not the sole property of the Zionists, who throw these terms around to squelch any just criticism of their inhuman actions against the Palestinian people.
Definitions provided by: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Hostility: "deep-seated usually mutual ill will"
Discrimination: "prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment racial discrimination"
It is evident that to be critical of the State of Israel is not a form of discrimination, nor is it antisemitic, as is always claimed by the Zionists. If it were not so, the State of Israel would be, by default, above international laws, laws that they ignore at present anyway with impunity. No wonder that this state thinks and acts as if it is their God given right to add other peoples land to theirs, at will.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zionism
"Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion."
A decription of Palestine can be found at, https://www.britannica.com/place/Palestine
Here is an interesting article by Michelle Alexander,
Time to Break the Silence on Palestine
published by The New York Times Jan. 19, 2019; it took true courage to write such an article because 'antisemitic bombs' will surely be employed to discredit not only the writer but also the message.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/martin-luther-king-palestine-israel.html
Now let us take a look at the ancient map, shown below, and a modus operandi becomes evident.
https://www.britannica.com/media/full/topic/439645/3079
When looking at the map closely, it becomes clear that the Jewish nation has a history of adding other peoples' land to the original Jewish state under Judas, and trying to eventually take all of the land from the Palestinians, settlement by settlement, appears to be nothing more than the same.
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
Blood Pressure Guidelines Follow The Example Of The Cholesterol Guidelines - Lowering Normal Ranges Spells More Money
I just learned (better late than never) that the new US guidelines (Nov. 2017) regarding blood pressure have been amended to add about 30,000,000 more patients that will be prompted to take medication, they probably really don't need. Not too long ago, per the medical wisdom, one had first stage high blood pressure only when 140/90 were exceeded; now it is after 130/80. Before we had about one in three with first stage hypertension, now it works out to roughly one in two. What a business model!
In view of these ever-changing of medical goal posts, likely for business reasons, it is very important that we, the patients, assume more responsibility for our own health. Doctors are trying to do their best with the 'Pharma' provided opinions/instructions, and their often published fake test results. But nothing stops us using common sense, and work with our doctor, to prevent damage to our health. I found a number of doctors who listened to their patients (like me), and were quite reasonable regarding objections.
I am showing the German text only to defend myself against any future claim by others, namely, that I am completely nuts for writing this, what looks like to be a ridiculous story. It appears, the Germans will most likely not follow these new US guidelines, it says; time will tell.
Die neuen Grenzwerte haben jedoch weitreichende Auswirkungen: War vorher nur etwa ein Drittel der US-Amerikaner von Bluthochdruck betroffen, ist jetzt fast jeder zweite ein potenzieller Bluthochdruckpatient. Die Zahl der Betroffenen wächst damit um gut 30 Millionen an.
Die deutschen Fachgesellschaften werden sich diesen neuen Grenzwerten vermutlich nicht anschließen. Auf der Basis der aktuellen Daten "empfehlen wir jedoch weiterhin einen generellen Zielwert von unter 135 zu 85 mmHg bei einer Selbstmessung", sagt Prof. Peter Trenkwalder, stellvertretender Vorstandsvorsitzender der Deutschen Hochdruckliga (DHL) und Mitglied der Task Force Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahmen und Leitlinien der DHL."
In view of these ever-changing of medical goal posts, likely for business reasons, it is very important that we, the patients, assume more responsibility for our own health. Doctors are trying to do their best with the 'Pharma' provided opinions/instructions, and their often published fake test results. But nothing stops us using common sense, and work with our doctor, to prevent damage to our health. I found a number of doctors who listened to their patients (like me), and were quite reasonable regarding objections.
I am showing the German text only to defend myself against any future claim by others, namely, that I am completely nuts for writing this, what looks like to be a ridiculous story. It appears, the Germans will most likely not follow these new US guidelines, it says; time will tell.
"Aktuelle Diskussion um Grenzwerte (taken from https://www.onmeda.de/blutdruck.html)
Bislang galten in den USA die gleichen Grenzwerte für Bluthochdruck wie in Deutschland: Ab Werten von 140 zu 90 mmHg war der Blutdruck zu hoch. Doch in der im November 2017 veröffentlichten neuen US-Leitlinie hat sich das geändert: Die neuen Grenzwerte liegen deutlich niedriger, nämlich bei 130 zu 80 mmHg. Den Autoren der Leitlinie zufolge ließe sich das Risiko für Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen (kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen) wie Herzinfarkt oder Schlaganfall deutlich senken, wenn die Blutdruckwerte unterhalb dieser neuen Grenze liegen.Die neuen Grenzwerte haben jedoch weitreichende Auswirkungen: War vorher nur etwa ein Drittel der US-Amerikaner von Bluthochdruck betroffen, ist jetzt fast jeder zweite ein potenzieller Bluthochdruckpatient. Die Zahl der Betroffenen wächst damit um gut 30 Millionen an.
Die deutschen Fachgesellschaften werden sich diesen neuen Grenzwerten vermutlich nicht anschließen. Auf der Basis der aktuellen Daten "empfehlen wir jedoch weiterhin einen generellen Zielwert von unter 135 zu 85 mmHg bei einer Selbstmessung", sagt Prof. Peter Trenkwalder, stellvertretender Vorstandsvorsitzender der Deutschen Hochdruckliga (DHL) und Mitglied der Task Force Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahmen und Leitlinien der DHL."
Saturday, January 5, 2019
What A Mother? ... What A Member Of Congress?
"At an event following her [Rashida Tlaib] swearing-in Thursday, Tlaib told a cheering crowd of supporters: "People love you. And you win."
"And when your son looks at you and says, 'Momma, look
you won, bullies don't win.' And I said, 'Baby, they don't,' because
we're gonna go in there and we're gonna impeach the motherfucker."" Name added.
I understand that in the heat of an argument nasty words can be uttered but in a normal conversation with a child, it is another matter. Moreover, this woman uses foul language in public, when speaking of the President of the United States; it was a vulgar expression at best, and yes it was protected by the First Amendment. However, this member of Congress clearly showed, what she is made of; I would not touch it.
More and more, I come to the conclusion that our political system is made up of two gangs, each fighting for control of the turf, for maximum personal gain, and for paying back those interested parties who sponsored them to run for office, under the pretext of working for the common people.
This latest circus called 'Border Wall' clearly demonstrates that our members of Congress and the Administration don't give a damn about the people, people who through no fault of their own, are unable the feed their families and pay the rent or mortgage because of the partial Government closure. Egos and turf war are the priorities of these gangs; if it were not so, they would compromise for the good of the people. No such luck I guess.
Thursday, January 3, 2019
911 Connected
This blog post will have to stand on its own feet; I will not comment on it other than to say, this is by no means news to many, it is however very interesting. Please follow the link below to learn things you may never have heard or read about.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/vice-the-dick-cheney-rumsfeld-conspiracy/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/vice-the-dick-cheney-rumsfeld-conspiracy/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)