"THE VACCINE CAUSES THE VIRUS TO BE MORE DANGEROUS"...Robert Malone M.D. - Inventor of mRNA Technology

First of all, thanks to John Day M.D. for providing this story, as well as his comments, quoted below.

"Robert Malone MD, inventor of mRNA Vaccine Technology, gets to speak without interruption to Steve Bannon, about Antibody Dependent (viral) Enhancement. Preliminary data is that those who had Pfizer vaccination carry 10 or more times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in their noses, compared to the unvaccinated."

 "I would call this "Enhanced Carrier State", which occurs in chicken and Turkey flocks where some have been vaccinated against a deadly avian virus, carry it without much harm, but spread it to the unvaccinated flock, which mostly dies. It looks like this may have happened on the planeload of unmasked, vaccinated Democratic Texas House Members who flew to Washington in a private plane. It appears to have spread among them during their time together."

 

"ADE" Antibody Dependent (viral) Enhancement has traditionally meant that vaccination increases the death rate among the vaccinated, which might also be happening, but that's not quite what this news flurry is about."

 

Next, you should listen to what Dr. Robert Malone is saying, in response to questions from Steve Bannions.

 

https://rumble.com/vkfz1v-the-vaccine-causes-the-virus-to-be-more-dangerous.html

 

Bannons War Room Published July 28, 2021 294,220 Views

You must click on on the above link itself to access the video; the picture is just a screenshot. 

 

Like I pointed out in a prior post: It will be the vaccinated that will drive the infection numbers up.

https://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/2021/07/who-will-drive-numbers-of-covid.html

Is it any wonder that so many are very hesitant, when it comes to these vaccines? 

To add insult to injury, by suppressing available off-label oral medications, they are morally, if not criminally, responsible for millions of deaths and injuries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

FREE STIMULUS MONEY... MY As*!

The following can apply to any country that acted similar to the U.S.

Free Stimulus Money?  Think again.

As the U.S. Government is handing out money like candies, and people are practically dancing in the streets, with joy in their hearts, there is, unfortunately, a certain reality connected to it.  In fact, there are two strikes already against the consumer, as explained below.

First, too much stimulus money running after goods and services, in a short supply economy stimulates suppliers to raise their prices, and not just by a little-bit but by sizable amounts, or percentages, if one wants to talk about normalized figures.

"This infographic shows the annual rate of change in U.S. consumer prices. (By: Büşra Öztürk / Daily Sabah)" 

https://www.dailysabah.com/business/economy/transitory-or-here-to-stay-inflation-is-not-going-away-just-yet

SECOND, massive printing of money, by the Federal Reserve, money that we really have not supported by gold, or any other meaningful standard, reduces the purchasing power of the dollar, pure and simple. 

The end-result is, on average one pays 5.4% more for goods and services, and to add insult to injury, one has to, additionally, shell-out more money, to make up for the weaker dollar.  It won't take that long before the stimulus monies have been given back to the Government, and thereafter, Governments (Federal and State) will collect a mountain of extra taxes, because of its gain from sales taxes on higher priced goods and services.  Prices seldom get back to their prior-inflation levels.  Also, under current monetary policies, the dollar will only get weaker against other major currencies.  Refer to Graph below.  This is good for exporters but not for consumers, the importers.  GET IT?

Click charts to enlarge

 https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=EUR&view=2Y

With Loan Sharks, after a loan is paid off (flesh and bones included), they will leave the debtor alone, not so with Governments we have elected.

Now, should people still be overjoyed because of the (free???) stimulus money?

 

 ARE WE STILL DANCING?

 

WHO WILL DRIVE THE NUMBERS OF COVID INFECTIONS FROM NOW ON?

We hear a lot of moaning and groaning from  Authorities at all levels, claiming that the Vaccine opponents are the cause for the current spikes in infections.  Recent history shows a different picture, that is to say, the vaccinated will drive up the numbers shortly, and for some time to come, it appears.  It becomes clear that the unvaccinated benefit from the natural occurring  Community (Herd) Immunity; the virus finds it harder and harder to find new victims (Hosts), it happens all the time with infectious pathogens.

The 'Spectator' reports that while infections of the Unvaccinated are sharply dropping, the infections by the Vaccinated are on the increase.  In fact, as shown in the graph below, their  curves are about to intersect, meaning that both are contributing equally.  There is a difference however, the numbers of the Unvaccinated infections are coming down, while the infection numbers of the Vaccinated are on a sharp increase.

"Covid infections might be high, but deaths are staying low. Kate speaks to Professor Tim Spector, the principal investigator on the ZOE app, a self-reporting symptom tracker for Covid-19, who explains why the data justifies the 19 July reopening. Tim tells Kate: 'We're infecting each other because the government is still not putting itself on the line and saying, actually things have changed and the five common symptoms are just like having a bad cold.'"

 Click on Graph to enlarge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dFSpSRTKwo&t=438s

The fact that  Professor Tim Spector is a well-known Researcher, I tend to trust his graph; his data source, by inference, is the CDC; he has 137,000 subscribers.

The CDC says in part,
"...breakthrough cases are expected, especially before population immunity reaches sufficient levels to further decrease transmission." 

If I read and understand this right, the CDC is relying (waiting) on Herd Immunity to reduce Breakthrough infections; that does not speak very well for these vaccines in use, does it?

Further the CDC points out the following cautions.
"The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, the number of reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases is likely a substantial undercount of all SARS-CoV-2 infections among fully vaccinated persons. The national surveillance system relies on passive and voluntary reporting, and data might not be complete or representative. Many persons with vaccine breakthrough infections, especially those who are asymptomatic or who experience mild illness, might not seek testing. Second, SARS-CoV-2 sequence data are available for only a small proportion of the reported cases."  Emphasis added.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e3.htm

Quite frankly, I was very surprised to read the limitations of their posted report, admitting a likely substantial undercount of infections among fully vaccinated people.  I heard, the undercount is, probably, by a factor of 10, that is to say, the CDC numbers need to be multiplied by 10 in order to show the probable vaccine effectiveness.  This is a typical Iceberg situation, where only 1/8 of it is visible.

Added July 20, 2021

Story links provided by John Day, M.D.

https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

Since 1990,  we never had so many people killed by Vaccines as now!  By the looks of it, the combined 30 year death-toll, from vaccines, falls way short of the current number of deaths.

"For Second Week in a Row: More COVID-19 Vaccination Deaths than COVID-19 Deaths in the US According to CDC and VAERS Websites" 
By Jim Hoft
Published July 17, 2021 at 7:20am

 It appears that we need, urgently, a Vaccine against the Vaccines!

I am being facetious, of course.

"Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?" 

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated - compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.  https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762 

The conclusion appears to be, vaccination, apart from the risk to health and life, is not as protective as is natural acquired immunity, following infection.

 

IF YOU NEVER WANT TO WATCH ANOTHER COVID VIDEO ... THIS SHOULD BE YOUR LAST ONE

 "In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections. Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason. In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects. "

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyPjAfNNA-U 

Warning, the above video link leads to the truth about all of these experimental vaccines, and how they can, in the near term, and/or future, complicate your life, by placing you at Hell's doorstep.

 Who is Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D.?

 

  Sucharit Bhakdi -  Thai-German microbiologist

  "Sucharit Bhakdi is a retired Thai-German microbiologist. In 2020 and 2021 Bhakdi became a prominent exponent of false ideas about the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that the pandemic was "fake" and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world's population." Wikipedia

"Born: November 1, 1946 (age 74 years), Washington, D.C.

Fields: Medicine/surgery, bacteriology and atherosclerosis

Books: Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures

Education: University of Giessen (1979), MORE

Awards: Aronson Prize, German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology Prize"

 

Sucharit Bhakdi/Education

 

Sucharit Bhakdi
	November 1, 1946 (age 74)         Washington, D.C., U.S.
	Thai-German
	University of Bonn, University of Giessen, University of Mainz, University of Copenhagen, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics
	Microbiology,[1] fringe ideas about COVID-19[2]
	Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate, Aronson Prize
	Medicine/surgery, bacteriology and atherosclerosis

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucharit_Bhakdi

 

 

Learn more about blood clots by following the link below.

 

https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-report/new-cause-of-covid-19-blood-clots-identified 

 

 

Concentration/Death Camps For The Unvaccinated?

 

 

 "Lefty CNN medical analyst suggests life 'needs to be hard' for those unvaccinated”

"CNN medical analyst suggests life 'needs to be hard' for unvaccinated Americans"

"CNN medical contributor Dr. Leana Wen suggested Saturday that life needs to be "hard" for Americans who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine and individuals who refuse to get shots should perhaps face weekly testings.

"It needs to be hard for people to remain unvaccinated," Wen, the former Planned Parenthood president, said. "Right now, it's kind of the opposite."

"Unvaccinated people, she fretted, can at the moment go about their lives as normal without any consequence."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-medical-analyst-life-hard-unvaccinated 

Leana Sheryle Wen, is an American physician, an op-ed columnist with The Washington Post and a CNN medical analyst. en.wikipedia.org

• Born: January 27, 1983 (age 38), Shanghai

Maybe this is the way things are done in her native country China, lucky for us, at the moment at least, the USA has not regressed that far back, just yet.

What is her next idea?  Internment and Execution of people who exercise their freedom of choice?

Unfortunately, many immigrants insist on bringing their ideologies with them, totally disrespecting local laws and customs.  Who in the world would hire such a nut?  Don't make me say it.

Her kind of thinking resembles that of Communist China, old USSR, and Nazi Germany, for example.  She may be book smart, however, she is lacking complete understanding, and respect of the western world, specifically, the U.S., she lives in.  I sincerely hope and pray that nobody takes her serious to the point of creating Concentration/Death Camps for the unvaccinated.  I hope I am joking.

I know what it was like to live under the NAZI regime, and I can smell, from a distance, the stench of it; what I just learned stinks to high heaven, in my opinion.  Where is the NSA?   Here is a person who, in my opinion, is a national security threat, still expressing her oppressive anti-social suggestions and opinions.

Added July 12, 2021   

“Number of Deaths Reported After COVID Vaccines Jumps by More Than 2,000 in 1 Week, According to VAERS
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 438,441 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 9,048 deaths and 41,015 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 2, 2021.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) included 9,049 reports of deaths, across all age groups, following COVID vaccines — an increase of more than 2,000 compared with the previous week. The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).”
https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2021/07/astonishing-spike-in-post-vaccine-deaths-gets-no-media-coverage-as-over-2000-reported-this-week-alone

Link provided by John Day, M. D.

As of June 2021, research shows that out of 169,090,262 vaccinated, 438,441 had serious adverse reactions.  This equates to 2.59, or about 3 people per 1000; not exactly small odds.

In addition, 5 (5.35) in 100,000 died, and approximately 3 (2.43) in 10,000 suffered serious injuries.

People must have the right to decide if they wish to gamble with their health or life.  No Communist China transplant shall have the right to suggest, publicly, hardship for the unvaccinated.  Who gives her the right to do so?  Threatening harm to others is not protected speech.

https://usafacts.org/visualizations/covid-vaccine-tracker-states/

Added July 15, 2021

"China mulls banning unvaccinated people from public places"

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/asia-pacific/china-mulls-banning-unvaccinated-people-from-public-places

This is where Leana Sheryle Wen, probably, got her idea from. If she likes the Communist Chinese ideas better than our freedom to chose what is good for our bodies, then I suggest, she ought to return to her China, for good.

 

                                        Hong Kong Airport , China, July 9, 2021

Is it not fun to travel/fly the Chinese way?  Don't laugh, we could be next; our administration loves to order nutty things, just for the hell of it, it seems.

 

 

 

DENYING RESPONSIBILITY FOR ADVERSE VACCINE REACTIONS BY BIG PHARMA AND MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

         Senator Ron Johnson

I highly recommend watching this video, it gives an insight into the lives of the victims involved, and there are many.   Click on link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8

Senator Ron Johnson gives voice to people, whose lives were turned into hell, following vaccinations; it is my understanding that all three of the major vaccines are involved.  Some of the people present at the hearing were volunteers for various vaccine trials, and although they were promised that in the event of complications, their medical expenses would be covered, none of the sufferers received a dime, so far.  It all makes sense now, by denying a link between the horrific health problems of volunteers and the vaccines they received, Big Pharma protects their profit margins.

Senator Johnson also showed some very interesting statistic, in the form of charts, as shown below.

The above graph shows that the highest frequency of deaths is on day two, following vaccination, and from day 10 through day 60 we are looking at daily averages.  From day 10 through day 14 about 85 people die each day, and between day 15 and day 30 about 50 people die because of the vaccines.

The foregoing chart shows that the death tolls from the COVID-19 vaccines almost equals the number of deaths recorded, over the last 30 years, for all other vaccines combined.  Also, deaths on days 0, 1 or 2, approach the 30-year record of all other vaccines injected.

The question begs, who has the moral authority to decide how many people to kill to save a few extras?  Let us consider that the death tolls from the virus itself, is only so exaggerated high because hospitals and doctors, in general, refused to treat the illness as soon as it was identified.  They sent the patients home, waiting to see if they could survive without treatment.  How stupid and cruel is this, so called, treatment plan.

Naturally, when people finally were on Death's door when arriving at hospitals, and doctors refused to use effective off-label drugs like Ivermectin and others, many people died needlessly.  By driving the number of deaths, artificially high thus creating panic among the people, which guaranteed a brisk future vaccine business for big Pharma.

The chart above spans a 25-year period, showing the safety profile for a few prescription drugs, and OTC medication.  Finally, it shows that in just six months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed many more.  Moreover, in just six months the vaccines also managed to produce 384,270 recorded adverse reactions, some of which produced life-changing medical complications.  In many cases, it turned perfectly healthy people into invalids.  Aside from permanent health issues, it will also affect people financially, no doubt.  It is not a far reach to assume that the count of adverse reactions is understated, given the reluctance to accept responsibility by all interested parties.  These folks spend a great deal of effort to pin the cause for these reactions on anything and everything they can think of, no matter how ridiculous.

Authorities are claiming they are following Science, to excuse their flawed self-serving decisions.  This is not Science, this appears to be the deliberate maiming and killing of innocent people.

In my previous  Post, VACCINATION RISK VS BENEFIT IN QUESTION, I wrote,
"The following study shows that real-life data support, with 95% confidence, twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19.  When using drugs like Ivermectin for early treatment, the risk of death by vaccination ratio would be even higher, in my opinion."

https://frankjm-socialconcerns.blogspot.com/2021/06/vaccination-risk-to-benefit-in-question.html

From everything, I read and understand, we would actually be better off without these vaccines, if we were treating the illness immediately with existing, effective off-label drugs (Ivermectin, etc.), following diagnosis.  We would keep people out of hospitals, where it is almost assured that they will experience lingering complications, and have a good chance to die.

Doctors, especially those working in hospitals and clinics, apply methods that are not very effective, over and over again; this fits perfectly the definition of insanity, does it not?

 

 

VACCINATION RISK VS BENEFIT IN QUESTION

The following study shows that real-life data support, with 95% confidence, twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19.  When using drugs like Ivermectin for early treatment, the risk of death by vaccination ratio would be even higher, in my opinion.

The following quotations are excerpts from the study referred to below.

 "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy"

 by Harald Walach, Rainer J. Klement and Wouter Aukema.

"Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital, 60-572 Poznan, Poland2Department of Psychology, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany3Change Health Science Institute, 10178 Berlin, Germany4Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany;rainer_klement@gmx.de5Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg 1, 7351 BD Hoenderloo, The Netherlands;"

From the Abstract

"Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000(95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. "

NNTV = Number Needed To Vaccinate; ADR = Adverse Drug Reactions; CI = Confidence Interval (95% under the Normal (Gaussian) Curve, or four Standard Deviations about the Mean)

"Thus, we need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination,
we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and,in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case,we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."

"The risk–benefit ratio looks better if we accept the stronger effect sizes from the phase3 trials. Using Cunningham’s estimate of NNTV = 12,300, which stems from a non-peer reviewed comment, we arrived at eight deaths prevented per 100,000 vaccinations and, in the best case, 33 deaths prevented by 100,000 vaccinations. Thus, in the optimum case, we risk four deaths to prevent 33 deaths, a risk–benefit ratio of 1:8. The risk–benefit ratio in terms of deaths prevented and deaths incurred thus ranges from 2:3 to 1:8, although real-life data also support ratios as high as 2:1, i.e., twice as high a risk of death from the vaccination compared to COVID-19, within the 95% confidence limit."  Emphasis added.

https://thefatemperor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Safety-of-COVID-19-Vaccinations%E2%80%94We-Should-Rethink-the-Policy.pdf

Link provided by Dr. John Day.

It should be obvious, for some time, that the entire vaccination campaign is questionable at best; it destroys the lives of too many people (short and long-term, as well as death), with little to show for but sinful profits for a few.

 

 

VACCINATION TURNS INTO MAGNETIC ATTRACTION ...?

 

The following was translated from a "Study on electromagnetism of vaccinated persons in Luxembourg". 

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Above link provided by Dr. John Day.

Translated from the French text. 
Please ignore minor grammatical errors, the result of translation.

Étude sur l’électromagnétisme des personnes vaccinées au Luxembourg

• Florent
• 20 juin 2021
• Manipulations & Gouvernance mondiale, Santé

Summary presentation of the results for the study week from June 1 to June 5, 2021:

Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated people were finally interviewed, whereas the aim was to interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.

The condition of gender distribution has been met. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were interviewed.
    In the group of unvaccinated, of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people with magnet attraction is 0 (zero). So the experience stops there for this group.
    In the group of vaccinated, on the other hand, of the 30 individuals interviewed, 29 have an attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adheres to their skin without difficulty. All of them are vaccinated in vaccinodrome.

NB: The 30th person, who does not have a hook on the magnet, was not vaccinated in vaccinodrome like all the others. She was vaccinated by a nurse with whom she has worked for many years.

Of these 29 individuals, 22 have the magnet that adhere to a single shoulder and only to the area of the injection. These 22 people are the ones who received only one injection.

The other 7 people in this same group have the magnet that adhere on both shoulders.

    In this group, known as vaccinated, domiciled or working in Luxembourg, it appears that:
    17 received at least one injection from pfizer laboratory
    7 received at least one injection from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    3 received at least one injection from the Moderna laboratory
    3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
    6 received all 2 injections from the Pfizer laboratory
    1 received the 2 injections from the Astra Zeneca laboratory
    1 received all 2 injections from the Moderna laboratory

 2 of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, had totally abnormal electric field emissions. For the nurse, a video was even made that shows the values emitted by the tester around his left shoulder. For the analyst, the values issued by the tester were approximately the same but the individual abruptly ended his participation under the effect of panic.  Of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 live or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives in Metz but works in Strassen.

It would appear that people who were vaccinated earlier in the government vaccination program are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds much better than in freshly vaccinated people.  More specific measures should be taken in relation to the latter finding.

Note: The exercise is totally destabilizing for the people interviewed, at no time are they asked to apply the magnet to any area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know if the magnet also adheres to the areas of the neck, chest, forehead or legs as well as whether other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhere. This is not feasible in public spaces.

Conclusion:

It appears that vaccinated people do indeed give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier individuals have been vaccinated, the stronger they release a field. This sensation and appreciation, which is only a matter of the tactile experience at the application and the removal of the magnet at the shoulder, should be checked much more accurately, on a larger number of people and with much more accurate devices.

It has been extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play the game of this rather destabilizing experience.

Individuals are interested in the experience out of curiosity and then, when they see that the magnet clings to their skin, they become doubtful at first, then suddenly they become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous not to say that they seem to be completely in shock.

People sincerely wonder how it is possible that a magnet can adhere to their skin as easily as it adheres to a metal pole.

They ask for explanations and the investigator reassures them that there must be a physical or biological explanation. They are referred to the doctor who advised them to be injected for understanding.

One lady even cried when she said that she did not want to be vaccinated but that she was forced to do so by her employer who forced her to do so on the pretext that she works in contact with customers.

In the discussions, it emerges that people do not even vaccinate themselves for medical or health reasons, nor out of conviction or fear of the disease, but more often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.

During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying after the fact that they are being held hostage in a political and psychosocial spiral. Many acknowledge that this injection is not consented to and that at no time have they been given rational explanations (according to the Oviedo Convention), i.e. an insight from the point of view of the balance between benefits and risks and explicit information as to the very composition of the vials used for injections. They then describe, after reflection and discussion, this act as: "error, madness, escape, solution, or even blackmail".

It is exactly these terms that came up very often in testimonies and notes.

Again, a much more thorough psychosocial investigation should be carried out into the real motives that led these vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected. The ideal would be to be able to record and film all the conversations, interviews and spontaneous exchanges with the vaccinated and then analyze them.

The investigation is stopped for reasons of conscience and morality because the investigator can no longer cope with the distress and helplessness of people whose faces petrify when they realize that they have been injected with a substance of which they ultimately know nothing.

The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, is very uncomfortable with these people who wonder about what is happening to them.

People become pale, white, nervous. They put a hand towards the forehead or cross their arms, pinching their lower lips. Some sweat from their hands because we see them wiped on their hips or thighs.

These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or truly palpable and measurable tension.

Among the interviewees, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep unhappiness when they realize after the fact that they have undoubtedly committed the irreparable.

The act of vaccination is, of course, an irreversible act.

In short:
To the question, is it true that people have an effect of electromagnetism after having undergone at least one act of vaccination? The answer is yes. Indeed, individuals become well electromagnetic on minimal injection zone.

To the question, what is injected into individuals and which causes this effect?

We reply that it is up to the governments and authorities guaranteeing public health and the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question because it is they who, upstream, took the heavy decision to "vaccinate" healthy populations with the help of "vaccines" still at the experimental stage and including, during clinical trials , all hamsters are dead.

We will not answer here for the responsibility of each other, but it is certain that if superparamagnetic nanoparticles (magnetic beads) have entered the composition of these so-called vaccines, on an experimental basis or for whatever reason whatsoever, whereas until then these were reserved only for anticancer therapies, then it is urgent to ask for a development , as soon as possible, to the pharmaceutical laboratories and health authorities which have given their authorisation for the placing on the market of these injections.

It is up to the toxicologists and pharmacologists who are now responsible for discovering the origins and causes of these attraction effects observed on vaccinated subjects and it is up to the politicians, who are the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country, to call very quickly for a thorough and public inquiry to be opened into the exact and actual composition of these so-called vaccines.

PS: 2 sites and 1 interesting working document to consult that deal with nano solutions and ferrofluids:

http://www.chemicell.com/

s://www.acrobiosystems.com/

https://bioperoxil.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/pdf/2018_03_30_Conf_Nano_Club_Condorcet.pdf

Are the vaccinated ones really magnetized? Experience and supply of Spike coupled with magnetic beads.

Source: https://lilianeheldkhawam.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/etude-sur-lattraction-magnetisme.docx"

https://www.divulgation.fr/manipulations-gouvernance-mondiale/etude-sur-lelectromagnetisme-des-personnes-vaccinees-au-luxembourg/

Although this is, in my opinion, a crude, small ad-hog study it seems, nevertheless, it makes one wonder what the intended, or unintended consequence of this magnetic field, at the injection site, is?

 

 

 

 

WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?

It is my understanding that by design, the Lipid Nano-Particles are to remain at the injection site, where they are supposed to do their job.  These lipids are not meant to wander all over the inside our bodies, posing a clear and present danger to some of our vital organs.  Turns out, this unwanted lipid behavior was known, early last year from a Chinese report, and apparently, talked about by the inner circle, of the controlling interests, who apparently, decided to withhold this knowledge, probably for fear of stepping on the Vaccine brake.

Discussion between (left to right) Dr. Robert Malone, Inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, Dr. Bret Weinstein, PhD Evolutionary Biology, and Steve Kirsch, Serial entrepreneur.

While for most organ tissues, the total lipid concentration ml decreased after some hours, as shown on the graph, as the material diffuses unexpectedly into the body.  The Bone Marrow and the Ovaries saw an increase in concentration, after about 4 hours following injection.  After 48 hours the concentrations for these were still on the rise, this, most likely, cannot be a good thing.  Finally, having unexpected free spike proteins circulating in our bodies, is less than comforting; it is quite dangerous in fact, considering possible future medical problems of all kinds.  So-called COVID-19 'Long Haulers' are perhaps the early warning signal, of things to come.

The discussion panel agreed at the end, one can get always vaccinated but cannot be unvaccinated, should problems arise.

As an aside, from what I know, the person injecting the material should first aspirate following insertion of the needle, to ensure no vein was punctured by accident; not once did I see this common sense procedure followed.  If by chance a blood vessel were punctured the injected material would enter the bloodstream directly; i.e. it becomes a main-liner which probably spells trouble. 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4

 

Based on the findings shown on the above graph, in another discussion the same panel discussed the "Informed consent and reproductive toxicity of vaccines (Robert Malone)".  The consensus was that they would not recommend vaccination, especially of young women.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMxuNvVgxlU

Background:

"mRNA vaccines rely on the delivery of mRNA into the cytoplasm of host cells, where it can be transcribed into antigenic proteins to trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies. However, mRNA is three to four orders of magnitude larger than molecules that readily diffuse into cells; in addition, the dense negative charge of mRNA electrostatically repulses the anionic cell membrane, preventing its uptake. Therefore, mRNA vaccines require a delivery vehicle that not only protects the nucleic acid from degradation but allows the mRNA to get into cells."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41578-021-00281-4  

"mRNA – Also known as messenger ribonucleic acid, mRNA is the only active ingredient in the vaccine. The mRNA molecules contain the genetic material that provide instructions for our body on how to make a viral protein that triggers an immune response within our bodies. The immune response is what causes our bodies to make the antibodies needed to protect us from getting infected if exposed to the coronavirus."

https://www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/HealthU/2021/01/11/a-simple-breakdown-of-the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/ 

We already know that fully vaccinated individuals (so called protected people) got infected with the real thing, and became sick, ranging from lightly sick to very ill; some unfortunately even died.  The numbers may be considered very small, in the eyes of faithful risk-takers but for non-gamblers the odds may be too high to experience serious complications, not to speak of actually dying.  Further, we also know that some people who had recovered from Covid-19, and achieved therefore natural immunity, when vaccinated later, ran into real problems because of the vaccine.  Equally, there are those who ended up with serious health issues following their vaccinations; 'Long Haulers' they call them.

At this time, there are no definitive answers to the question, WHY DID THE LIPID NANO-PARTICLES INJECTED INTO THE ARM MUSCLE VIOLATE THE STAY IN PLACE ORDER?  Producers of these vaccines are playing their cards close to their chest; they deny and/or stonewall any  inquiries regarding observed adverse reactions and consequences, caused by their products.

More and more we hear from people who prefer to resign from their jobs, when their employers demand their vaccinations.  I know of one doctor who put his management on notice that should they make vaccination mandatory, he will resign.  I suppose he understands the dangers of these half-baked vaccines, better than most of us.

Apparently, a leaked internal report from Astra-Zeneca claims that the death rate, per million, of the  other vaccine (Pfizer) was higher than their own.  See the images shown below.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO3g0jCO6v8&t=46s

It is safe to assume that the actual death rates per million are much higher because of apparent deliberate under-reporting.  So much information has been and still is hidden from the public, such as the more serious side effects and the strange, unexpected diffusion of injected material into organ tissues, as discussed above, for example.  Also, the suppression of viable drugs, like Ivermectin and others, speaks volumes; refusing to treat patients early, thus increasing the number of ICU cases, and deaths enforces the Angst (existential fear) among the population, thus ensuring vaccination compliance, ensuring the mega transfer of tax dollars to Big Pharma and friends.  We are told over and over, the vaccinations are free; they are not!

Israel reported a probable link between Pfizer vaccine and 'Myocarditis' (Heart muscle inflammation), following injections.  In fact, 275 cases were recorded between December 2020 and May 2021, out of about five million vaccinations.  This computes to 55 cases per million.  "Severe myocarditis weakens the heart and forms clots which even lead to a stroke or heart attack."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PRScVeHt7k

Note:

You can get your Ivermectin prescription through one of the doctors listed on the FLCCC portal using the link below.  I suggest having this drug on hand, should you become infected.  The cost is about $115 doctor fee plus whatever the pharmacy charges (about $90 for 5 day regimen).  Is is inexpensive, considering you will be, most likely, virus free in about a week.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

 

Last but not least, I highly recommend watching the video testimony before a Texas Senate HHS committee, by Peter McCullough, MD, a more than qualified expert witness.  I have addressed, in my previous posts, the same issues, the lack of early treatment, doctors hiding behind FDA's, NIH's illogical pronouncements against the use of off-label drugs for early treatment, Social Media's blocking anything said, or written in favor of early home treatments with available approved drugs, etc., etc.

While I was touching on most of these issues in one way or another previously, Dr McCullough does it so much better; please learn, from an expert, about our total medical system failure, at all levels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM 

 

 

 

 

 

"Fauci, Facebook: Pandemic show in policy must go on"

 The following article, written By Melih Altınok, was taken from the 'Daily Sabah' - Turkish News. 

"Facebook's changing policies on pandemic censorship and leaked emails make people think about scenarios. It seems like the pandemic theater will continue in the post-Trump America"

"During the pandemic, there has been intense censorship applied to the scientific theses that the World Health Organization (WHO) did not "recognize." Various scientific arguments about the function of isolation measurements or the safety of treatment methods were restricted on the internet.

Social media platforms, which supposedly broke the property relations of conventional media and opened space for freedom of expression, became the implementers of this shameful global censorship.

However, Facebook, one of the members of the modern inquisition we are talking about, recently made a surprising decision and announced that it will no longer censor posts that contain claims that the virus may be lab-made.

While it has become apparent who pulls the strings of it during the pandemic, we do not know why Facebook made this statement, which is in a sense a confession.

Predictions imply that Facebook is preparing for a new global scenario, just like in the coronavirus process.

I don't know if you are one of those who still say "these are conspiracy theories" after what we have witnessed for a year. However, the possibility of starting a propaganda process in which the entire bill will be charged to China does not seem utopian to me.

Or, to put it simply, we can count this move as an indicator of Facebook's effort to adapt to the burning facts that will emerge about the pandemic process.

Fauci’s role

The revelations have already begun. An extremely important example is about Dr. Anthony Fauci. The emails of the doctor, who is one of the most staunch advocates of the isolation process in the U.S. and the world, were leaked to the press.

As we learned from the news, Fauci, whom was referred to by the former U.S. President Donald Trump as "the U.S. nation is lucky that I did not listen to him," was the person who advised Facebook to censor anti-isolation theses.

In his emails, Fauci wrote that isolation measures such as masks did not work, even though he did not appear in front of the cameras without a double mask.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens as U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during an event to commemorate the 50 millionth COVID-19 shot in Washington, U.S., Feb. 25, 2021. (AP Photo)

It is clearly quackery that Fauci, as a physician and scientist, hides from the public what he knows, lies and proposes measures that he knows will not work.

However, this emerging hypocrisy of Fauci, which incumbent U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris marketed to her voters by stating, "I will get vaccinated if Fauici suggests it, and I will not if Trump says it" is not a personal matter.

Fauci's relationship and responsibility with decision-making mechanisms in the U.S. and around the world increase the importance of the scandal that has emerged. The cost of the harsh isolation measures symbolized by Fauci to the world and humanity is incalculable.

So, what would be the possible effects of this development, which clearly show that the pandemic is being used as a political tool?

Would Fauci and his email friends who are covering the facts, such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg, provide self-criticism for the burdens we have been shouldering as the human family for a year?

You are right. Nothing will change if they come up with self-criticism or not.

However, the goal was partially achieved. Under the pretext of the pandemic, they succeeded in adding the electronic ballots, which it is unclear where they came from, to the closed ballot boxes and eliminating Trump.

It was this strategic goal that mattered. Everything after that is just tactics that can be revised."

https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/fauci-facebook-pandemic-show-in-policy-must-go-on