Total Pageviews

Wednesday, November 15, 2023

ENDING SUPPORT FOR ALL ILLEGAL WARS WOULD HELP PAY FOR FREE MEDICAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION, AND MORE, FOR ALL IN US

First let us examine the level of the US military budget.

“The United States spends more on national defense than China, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom, Germany, France, South Korea, Japan, and Ukraine — combined. While the chart above illustrates last year’s defense spending in dollar terms, the United States has also historically devoted a larger share of its economy to defense than many of its key allies.

Defense spending accounts for 12 percent of all federal spending and nearly half of discretionary spending. Total discretionary spending — for both defense and non-defense purposes — is typically only about one-third of the annual federal budget. It is currently below its historical average as a share of GDP and is projected to decline further.” https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison

When adding China's and Russia's spending, we get about $378 Billions, that is, the US spends $499 Billions more than these countries together. Right there, we have money that could be used to solve homeland problems. Added to this, the US spent approximately $78 Billions, so far, for the Ukraine proxy war against Russia. In addition, the US provides annually Billions of US dollars for Israel, Egypt and others, most of it is for military spending.

If the US were swimming in non-borrowed cash, and all domestic social needs, including infrastructure had been met (no person goes hungry to bed, or has to sleep in a car or under a bridge, etc,), then one could understand humanitarian aid to other countries, however, never at the expense of the US citizenry. For the current US debt level, which is approaching $34 Trillion, follow this link.  https://www.truthinaccounting.org/about/our_national_debt?gclid=CjwKCAiA9dGqBhAqEiwAmRpTC6I3cd9sCTVfW6yRq46t3TgYOZY7LND6tMgfOVrn5FS06M5ynnkkExoCTywQAvD_BwE

California has started a program, which provides free healthcare, for everyone regardless of citizenship status. “Health Care for All – California believes that every resident of California should be guaranteed affordable, comprehensive, high quality health care. A single-payer financing system has succeeded in countries throughout the developed world. Multiple findings illustrate that people in these countries have better health and enjoy a lifestyle free of anxiety and worry about how to pay for a health crisis. All of this is accomplished at a lower cost to the people and businesses.” https://healthcareforall.org/

If California manages to afford such a program, why not the US federal Government? Is it because the Federal Government is wasting to much borrowed money on military actions that violate the US Constitution?

Higher education for anyone meeting educational standards, and wishing to earn a degree in any worthwhile discipline, should be given the opportunity to do so, without assuming a massive debt because of it.

If US households would run their finances like the US Government does, they all be bankrupt. The Government's spending, like a drunken sailor, shows a very low IQ, or a willingness to destroy this and future generations, for personal gain.

THE QUESTION IS, WHY ARE WE ALLOWING THIS?

We need a plan.

The politicians have managed to divide and conquer us, for a very long time, by following the example of Julius Cesar. To them we are known as Democrats, Republicans and Liberals, and in so doing they have managed to breakup a powerful voting block, the Citizenry, into manageable single-minded, easily influenced groups, ready to accept whatever bullshit they hand out. Yes, life is good for them, all they have to do is, concentrate on building their war-chest of money, which allows them to character assassinate their opponent, at election time. Where is this money coming from? Powerful very rich Benefactors (corporations and investors) have plans of their own, they need politicians to make laws that respect their requirements. From where get these benefactors their enormous wealth? The symbiotic relationship between the rich and the politicians is the answer, whereby the politicians help their benefactors to extract wealth from the economy, at the expense of the Citizenry, and in return the benefactors provide war-chest money for the politicians' election or reelection campaign. It is that simple.  Also, this is why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

By now, almost everyone should be familiar with the power of the Internet and their cell phones, for research and communication purposes. These tools instead of dividing us, can help us to reunite, thus forming a formidably voting block, more powerful than the bribes of the rich and powerful.

More and more we experience the fact that the so-called opposing politicians are actually part of a Uni- party because they have worked together for a long time, under the table, against our interests. Unconstitutional harmful spending can only happen within a Uni-Party; it is strictly them against us.

Now, the time has come to turn the table on them, by creating unity of all Citizen of good will, in order to save our country from moral and economic ruin. Let us use technology (internet and cell phones) to talk with and listen to our brothers and sisters, who love the US, and are not out to destroy it.

The first step is to share this message with all your families, friends and neighbors. Then start a respectful conversation, be patient, change is never easy. Maybe we have to select a write-in candidate for President, for sure we cannot vote for these over-the-hill senile useless power hungry individuals, who should have been retired, a long time ago. The US needs capable younger mature talents, who respect the Constitution. Why should it take one billion dollars to run for President, a sure invitation for corruption?

It has to start now, the time for kicking the can down the road is over; if you don't do it for yourself, do it for the next generations, they will thank you.

Together we are stronger than all the corrupt money in banks and financial institutions. We can make the politicians listen to us and only us, the electorate!



Your comments and/or suggestions are very welcome!






Sunday, November 12, 2023

WHAT DOES THE US CONSTITUTION SAY, IF ANYTHING, ABOUT WARS NOT ACTUALLY THREATENING THE CONTINENTIAL US?

 Disclaimer:  The writer is not a Constitutional attorney/specialist, nor is he a lawyer, however, he  has extensive legal experience, acquired over more than five years, litigating two separate 'Legal Malpractice' actions, in Superiors Courts, successfully, acting as his own attorney (In Pro Per).  One Action of which involved the Appellate Court and a State Supreme Court, against a prestigious law firm, which represented one of the defendants, the attorney of record.

He has in addition a good deal of experience, in reading and enforcing contracts, as well as enforcing design and fabrication specifications, in positions of Corporate Director - Quality Assurance (QA), Director - QA and QA - Manager, in the Aircraft and Aerospace industries, both commercial and military.

 The US Constitution is not a complicated document to read, it is written, for the most part, in plain English.  Complications arise only when Courts and lawyers read into the document meanings not intended, and add their self-serving spins, when  writing the individual United States Codes, to serve a particular purpose.

The US constitution can suffer from either of two conditions:

  1. People reading it with preconceived ideas (wishful thinking) or,
  2. Politicians, the Courts and lawyers, who are unknowing or knowingly misinterpret it, to suit their planned, or completed questionable actions.

The following is the result of the writers reading and research, and may be looked at as an opinion, of one unbiased individual.

 Reference: The US Constitution:

"The Preamble"

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."  Emphasis added.

Defense is the action of defending from or resisting an attack.  It certainly should not include so-called preemptive strikes, often used for Geopolitical reasons, or misguided calculations.    It also should not include wars executed on behalf of other countries, including 'Proxy Wars'.  Equally, it should not include the free supply of weapons and military personnel to other countries, at the expense of the American taxpayer.  In addition, it should not include the supply of military personnel, for the purpose of extracting natural resources from other weaker countries, against their will, again all at the expense of the American taxpayer.

Now, let us look at what the Constitution says, regarding war.

Under Article I. Section Section 8, We find;

"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;"  Emphasis added.

Comment: Common Defense, means that the Federal Government maintains an army and defends all states, instead of each state having its own army.

 "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and
make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

Comment: "When hostile action is taken against the Nation or against its citizens or commerce, the President may resort to force in response. But whether the Constitution empowers the President to commit troops abroad to further national interests absent a declaration of war or specific congressional authorization short of such a declaration has been controversial."  Emphasis added. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C11-3/ALDE_00013589/

 For example, hostile action against Ukraine by Russia does not count!  Some nations having Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) does not apply either; the US has weapons of Mass Destruction (Nuclear bombs and missiles, etc.), for example.  It must be a hostile action taken against the Nation or against its citizens or commerce, anything else points to a violation of the Constitution.

Because of this narrow and strict Constitutional rule on war, there was always a need for instances, like

  • Pearl Harbor
  • 9/11
  • Constitutionally invalid reasons, like, Possession of  WMD by Iraq and Syria, etc., etc.

"To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of
Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two
Years;"

"To provide and maintain a Navy:"

"To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the
land and naval Forces:"

"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws
of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions:"  Emphasis added.

Comment:  Again, the Constitution points to a need for an invasion of the US, in order to call forth the Militia.

"To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the
Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be
employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to
the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers,
and the Authority of training the Militia according to the
discipline prescribed by Congress;"

Under Section 10, we find:

"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any
Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of
Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another
State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless
actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not
admit of delay." 
Emphasis added.

Comment:  It follows, since no state may engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay, the collection of all the states, the US, must abide by this Constitutional command applicable to any and all states.
 
The bottom line is, "... unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay", the US, according to the Constitution, may not engage in wars.  All these so called military police actions, violate the Constitution, in my opinion. OT
 "These operations include the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, the Afghanistan War of 2001 and the Iraq War of 2002. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war. The President, meanwhile, derives the power to direct the military after a Congressional declaration of war from Article I, Section 8, Clause 11, which names the President Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. These provisions require cooperation between the President and Congress regarding military affairs, with Congress funding or declaring the operation and the President directing it. Nevertheless, throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, Presidents have often engaged in military operations without express Congressional consent," How can the Congress agree with a violation of the Constitution?

https://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/constitution.pdf

You may want to read the Constitution yourself, highly recommended.  Please follow the link below.

https://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/constitution.pdf

 Your comments will be very much appreciated.



Thursday, November 9, 2023

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE, WITH INTERNATIONAL LAWS VIOLATED WITH IMPUNITY?

 During WW II all the conventions, formulated in 1949, shown below were violated, hence the need for universal agreements of civility even during conflicts.

"Impunity is the ability to act with exemption from punishments, losses, or other negative consequences. In the international law of human rights, impunity is failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice and, as such, itself constitutes a denial of the victims' right to justice and redress." Wikipedia

In Israel's case, it appears that international laws do not apply to their violations of of human rights and decency, Geneva Conventions, as well as UN resolutions.  The fact that some nations turn a blind eye to all of their gruel actions, is alarming.  Moreover, the fact that some of these nations actually provide weapons, to ensure the utter destruction of civilian lives and properties of the occupied, is more than disgusting.

"What are the four Geneva Conventions?

"International humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war or the law of armed conflict, is a set of international laws that establish what can and can't be done in an armed conflict. The best known of these rules are found in the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, ratified by 196 countries. Emphasis added.

The rules of war are universal. IHL protects all victims of armed conflicts, including civilians, and combatants who are injured, have been captured or have laid down their arms."

The following  link contains detailed instructions for both Israel and Palestine.  Sadly, these obligations are, for the most part, ignored.

"THE OBLIGATIONS OF ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW"  https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/israel/hebron6-04.htm

"Rules for the occupier in a conflict"  "Reprisals against protected persons or their property are prohibited. The confiscation of private property by the occupant is prohibited. The destruction or seizure of enemy property is prohibited, unless absolutely required by military necessity during the conduct of hostilities. Cultural property must be respected."  Emphasis added.   https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/misc/634kfc.htm

"The Middle East Will Cause WW3! Iran will ENTER Israel!!" - Exclusive Interview Prof. Finkelstein"

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuxUUpzc18

Your comments would be very much appreciated.