"Mr. President,
It appears, instead of fighting ISIS, you are about to fight their fight. Ron Paul (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-06/ron-paul-zero-chance-assad-behind-chemical-weapons-attack-syria-likely-false-flag) is absolutely right, logic tells us that the only beneficiaries of this chemical attack are our military complex and ISIS, I suggest the latter have once again sacrificed innocent humans to try to drag the US into their fight against Assad. In other words, we are dealing with a false flag attack. ISIS in the aftermath probably mixed with the victims proclaiming (lying) that the gas was delivered via bombs, designed to clearly point the finger at Assad and his military. If this is all it takes to get us involved, we must either be looking for any excuse to bomb Syria, or we lack simple logic. Why are we not considering investigating this incidence first, before we jump to conclusion? They (ISIS) most likely targeted women and children, fully knowing the effect it would have around the world. This is not the first time false flag attacks have been used to advance their objective.
Currently it looks like that, we the US are easy to provoke to support anybody's objective, including the objectives of ISIS, apparently. Let us not jump to conclusion, based on what somebody said on the ground; we know that ISIS can mingle with victims, claiming to be survivors. The White Helmets, in Syria, are a good example, for this argument; these white helmets are a convenient way to disguise themselves. By some accounts, they were shown to commit atrocities, just before they placed these helmets onto their heads, playing the role of rescuers.
Please let us investigate first!
Frank Maier"
_________________________________
Why am I concerned about this rush to action? Having lived through WW II as a innocent civilian, I do not wish to see us adding more victims than already exist. There is always, what is called, collateral damage; this collateral damage happen to be dead or injured human beings, and not some stone buildings only. I am also against this rush to action without some fact finding, first. Starting military action based on rumors and hearsay only, is always bad news.
In addition, the world has been deceived by these White Helmets with propaganda films, to the point that at one time they were considered for the Nobel peace price; only outcries by people in the know stopped this madness. Go onto the web and do your research, and you will find the other side of the coin, like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS1Nx8L3QTk, which has photographic evidence showing their real purpose in life, and it is not saving people. These ISIS criminals are supported with millions of dollars not only by the USA, but also by Britain and other countries; for honorable purposes? I think not.
At times, the US and other Governments publicly announce a red line, which when crossed by a certain country, thus warned, would trigger a severe response against that party. This could be a well meaning warning, but it has drastic side-effects, because opposition parties to the government warned, now have a clear target for a false flag attack, which is guaranteed to advance their illegal objectives. History shows that many major world conflicts were the result of false flag attacks by a third party. ISIS (and their many associates) is no exception; this scenario has been demonstrated a number of times, in recent history.
Here is what Rep. Tulsi Gabbard had to say.
ReplyDelete"Rep. Tulsi Gabbard: Trump’s Military Strikes in Syria Are Reckless and Short-Sighted
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Posted on April 6, 2017
Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) released the following statement today (4/6/17) after the U.S. launched military strikes on Syrian government targets:
“It angers and saddens me that President Trump has taken the advice of war hawks and escalated our illegal regime change war to overthrow the Syrian government. This escalation is short-sighted and will lead to more dead civilians, more refugees, the strengthening of al-Qaeda and other terrorists, and a possible nuclear war between the United States and Russia.
“This Administration has acted recklessly without care or consideration of the dire consequences of the United States attack on Syria without waiting for the collection of evidence from the scene of the chemical poisoning. If President Assad is indeed guilty of this horrible chemical attack on innocent civilians, I will be the first to call for his prosecution and execution by the International Criminal Court. However, because of our attack on Syria, this investigation may now not even be possible. And without such evidence, a successful prosecution will be much harder.”
Taken from: https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2017/04/06/rep-tulsi-gabbard-trumps-military-strikes-in-syria-are-reckless-and-short-sighted/
From everything I read, the Government "believes" it was the Syrian regime who carried out the gas attack. I say, a belief is not equivalent to knowing for certain. To use military force based on a belief is quite extraordinary, to say the least. The Radar image released by the Government is no proof that gas containers were dropped; it only proofs that a plane was in the air around the time. Syria, unfortunately, bombs its people regularly, which everybody seems to accept as normal; only the gas is objectionable apparently. What idiots!
ReplyDeleteEven eyewitness accounts differ considerably, as shown.
"At 6:30 in the morning, the plane struck. I ran up on our roof and saw that the strike was in front of my grandfather's house," Mazin told CNN.
About 25 survivors of Tuesday's attack are being treated there, and several said they saw a plane drop chemical bombs.
Another survivor, Ahmed Abdel Rahim, 31, stared vacantly from his hospital bed while explaining he was hit with a poisonous substance carried by three rockets.
The boy's grandmother, Aisha al-Tilawi, 55, said she saw blue and yellow after the plane dropped a chemical-laden bomb."
As reported by:
http://ktla.com/2017/04/05/russia-claims-that-terrorist-chemical-factory-caused-syria-gas-deaths-rejected/
A recent report by Professor Theodore A. Postol, professor emeritus of science, technology, and national security policy at MIT, (see link
ReplyDeletehttp://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/04/67102.html)
concludes that this Sarin Gas attack was fabricated, and poorly at that.
I was trying to post the following on Trumps site, however, it got rejected, as follows.
ReplyDelete"Special characters such as emoji are not permitted in this field. Please remove Mr. President, The report, by Theodore A. Postol, professor emeritus of science, technology, and national security policy at MIT, published in the Washington Blog makes interesting reading. The main expertise of Postol is in ballistic missiles. He has a substantial background in air dispersal, including how toxic plumes move in the air. Postol has taught courses on weapons of mass destruction – including chemical and biological threats – at MIT. I would be very interested in reading your reaction to it. As an aside, President Obama was not too big to respond to some of my messages, I am sure the same is true with you. Regards, Frank Maier in order to submit this form."
It appears, the report or reference to it is censured by the White House. So much for free speech, and our first amendment of the Constitution. As an aside, the link to this report was earlier rejected; I was only trying to be helpful by showing it.